Switch Theme:

Heavy Bolters - The last choice.  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Poll
What would make Heavy Bolters a viable choice for you?
1, ROF 4
2. Make it cheaper. Free for tacs -5 cost.
3. Give it the blast template Hellfire that scouts get.
4. Increase it to S 6.
5. Give it multiples of the options or it will always lose out.

View results
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in gb
Long-Range Land Speeder Pilot





Bristol

I think they have their place (from C:SM point of view) dakka predators (AC/Dual HBs), speeders (TML + HB or dual HBs) or HB attack Bikes are all solid anti-infantry platforms.

I think the problem is who/where the options are. So for example devastators/havocs/long fangs are generally providing long range anti-tank fire power (so AC/MLs) for the army, which normally isn't lacking in anti-infantry fire power (normally mass bolters).
 
Forum Index » 40K Proposed Rules
Go to: