H.B.M.C. wrote:Now all we need to do is bring religion into this some how. Hmm... ah-hah!
"If baby Jesus had a gun, you wouldn't abort him!" There.
Relgion? Check.
Abortion? Check.
Gun Control? Check.
Boom! Trifecta Bumper Sticker.
Shall we go for Superfecta and add Godwin's Law?
"If Baby Jesus had been born around 1920 with a gun, he would not have been aborted and would have been old enough to assassinate Hitler with it before his invasion of France!"
Automatically Appended Next Post: 
azazel the cat wrote:RatBot wrote:If one of these criminal fetuses was convicted of 1st degree murder and sentenced to death, would that be an abortion or an execution?
I believe the State of Texas would then carry out the sentence of abortion on the fetus. The fetus obviously doesn't have the mental competencies to understand it all, but that's never stopped a Texas execution before.
I'm a Republican that grew up in Louisiana and lived in Texas for the last 15 years, so let me chime in.
My Pro-Gun sides says that all fetuses should be allowed the right to a gun.
My Anti-Crime side says that all criminal fetuses convicted of murder should be killed.
My Fiscal Conservatism tells me that profiling fetuses that have convicted crimes is a waste of tax payer money.
My religious upbringing tells me that this is what happens when you have out of wedlock pregnancies. No couple should be allowed to couple before wedlock.
My small government side says that welfare has led to the entitlement of babies, making them more prone to rash actions before birth, like murder.
My Louisiana education tells me that you can become pregnant from kissing, so if kissing abstinence was taught in schools, we would have fewer babies that would become criminals.
Finally, my adopted Texan side says that our recently repealed "
needed killing" laws were adequate. Perhaps some of these fetuses went after people that "needed killing".
I'm going to take a nap now. Too much conflict for one day!
