Switch Theme:

Standard Measurement of Competitiveness  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in us
Painlord Titan Princeps of Slaanesh





I thought it was funny how the new riptide was compared to the heldrake on the homepage of dakkadakka. Riptide won.

I was joking about how we judge how competitive a CSM was by how many drakes it took. Having 3 drakes makes any bad CSM list very competitive. I bet you if you took the bare minimum compulsory requirements with the 3 drakes, it will still be extremely good at its point level.

I was wondering what other units do we compare other models or squads to.

For example I try to measure every infantry to a 15pt space marine.
   
Made in gb
Cowboy Wannabe



London

Um, this is in the wrong forum. Tactics or general 40K discussion would be better.

Model to model, o I only compare for special models. MC's characters etc. beatsticks compare to Lysander or Swarmlord, buffs to IG CCS or SM librarians.

With regard to units, tactical marines are the base to compare other marines to. (so GH are clearly better than the base), and for others it's more a general thing, or in-codex, rather than a game wide comparison, at least for me.
   
Made in us
[DCM]
.







Agreed - over to 40K General it is...
   
Made in us
Longtime Dakkanaut




Typically I dot use too much comparison. And typically it's more model to model SC's and such, what are their special rules, what is their durability, what are they actually bringing to an army? For squads and such I try not to do too much comparison while I'm building a list. I try to think more of what the squad does and how it works for what I'm making. I would never say "I can't take scouts because look how crappy they measure up to grey hunters". Any comparison I would make is more squad to squad in the same book.
   
 
Forum Index » 40K General Discussion
Go to: