Switch Theme:

RMAH blows up in Blizzard's face  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in nl
Decrepit Dakkanaut






People still play Diablo 3?
Made in nl
Decrepit Dakkanaut






 Ahtman wrote:
 Trondheim wrote:
Wait what? Diablo 3 was horrid.



88% Metacritic. Why does that seem familiar? Oh yeah, Diablo 2 has the exact same score.

87.64% on Gamerankings

I understand for some it is hard to understand that simply not liking something doesn't make it actually bad, but it is true. For instance I don't enjoy Skyrim, but many did, and it seems like a fine game, it just didn't do it for me. I won't run around calling it horrid just because I didn't like it. The core gameplay in Diablo 3 is solid, and if you think it is horrid, you must have thought that Diablo and Diablo 2 were also horrid, as it is essentially the same. The level up system is different, but the point and click mayhem is the same. The story was Ok, and probably not as good as 2, to be sure, but then expectations were through the roof, which has a habit of making anything seem lackluster. Was it a great game? Nah. Was it a good game? Most certainly. Much of the problems are external; if it didn't have RMAH and 'always online' I don't believe we would be having this discussion.


Yeah... ratings based on a faulty numerical system that has no meaning whatsover, made by people who get paid for giving higher ratings... these are the true judge of quality games right?

IMO D3 was worse then D2 in every way, except I guess updated graphics, though the loss in atmosphere kind of hampers that too. Classes, skill system, level up system, combat, loot, enemies, story... it was all better in D2, even before LoD.
 
Forum Index » Video Games
Go to: