Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/05/10 19:51:51
Subject: DKs Vs BT: Unlikely but curious
|
 |
Blood-Raging Khorne Berserker
|
Say a Bloodthirster was triple assaulted by Dreadknights. Can he essentially protect himself via challenges and just take them out 1 by 1? or can the DKs decline a challenge now that they are not the only character in the close combat? Making it so 1 DK sits while the other 2 lump up the Bloodthirster.
|
I need to return some video tapes.
Skulls for the Skull Throne |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/05/10 20:03:41
Subject: DKs Vs BT: Unlikely but curious
|
 |
Captain of the Forlorn Hope
|
Read Heroic Stand page 64
|
"Did you notice a sign out in front of my chapel that said "Land Raider Storage"?" -High Chaplain Astorath the Grim Redeemer of the Lost.
I sold my soul to the devil and now the bastard is demanding a refund!
We do not have an attorney-client relationship. I am not your lawyer. The statements I make do not constitute legal advice. Any statements made by me are based upon the limited facts you have presented, and under the premise that you will consult with a local attorney. This is not an attempt to solicit business. This disclaimer is in addition to any disclaimers that this website has made.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/05/11 02:43:37
Subject: Re:DKs Vs BT: Unlikely but curious
|
 |
Devestating Grey Knight Dreadknight
|
Dreadknights aren't required to accept challenges, so 1 can decline and you'll only have to fight 2.
|
Hope is the first step on the road to disappointment. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/05/11 03:32:59
Subject: Re:DKs Vs BT: Unlikely but curious
|
 |
The Hive Mind
|
greyknight12 wrote:Dreadknights aren't required to accept challenges, so 1 can decline and you'll only have to fight 2.
You should heed DeathReaper's advice.
|
My beautiful wife wrote:Trucks = Carnifex snack, Tanks = meals. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/05/11 03:33:44
Subject: DKs Vs BT: Unlikely but curious
|
 |
[DCM]
Tilter at Windmills
|
Yeah, the rules are quite clear on this.
|
Adepticon 2015: Team Tourney Best Imperial Team- Team Ironguts, Adepticon 2014: Team Tourney 6th/120, Best Imperial Team- Cold Steel Mercs 2, 40k Championship Qualifier ~25/226
More 2010-2014 GT/Major RTT Record (W/L/D) -- CSM: 78-20-9 // SW: 8-1-2 (Golden Ticket with SW), BA: 29-9-4 6th Ed GT & RTT Record (W/L/D) -- CSM: 36-12-2 // BA: 11-4-1 // SW: 1-1-1
DT:70S++++G(FAQ)M++B++I+Pw40k99#+D+++A+++/sWD105R+++T(T)DM+++++
A better way to score Sportsmanship in tournaments
The 40K Rulebook & Codex FAQs. You should have these bookmarked if you play this game.
The Dakka Dakka Forum Rules You agreed to abide by these when you signed up.
Maelstrom's Edge! |
|
 |
 |
|