Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

Hey all

I'd really appreciate it if someone can show me a size comparison between the empire huntsman/ archers and a cadian or brettonian men at arms, I am interested to know if cadian torsos & arms look ok with the huntsmen legs

and also If the FW HH meltaguns are ok for using with cadian arms, the default space marine ones are huge so I'd just like to see how much smaller before I go an buy a pack of 10

any help would be hugely appreciated,

Noodles

I don't know if they would look OK, but since we are talking about GW only stuff, their scale should be perfect for bits swap. Here's an example of 40k stuff together with WHFB:

The FW Melta guns and Cadian Command Squad Melta guns are pretty much the same size. The FW one is ever so slightly bigger, but not enough to be a problem.

Thanks for the help, I found some images on the dakka gallery of empire huntsmen being using for 40k so that was a help

@ TheDraconicLord: GW's scale ranges quite a bit across their ranges especially between races. I know most of the empire range, such as the flagellates, fit well with 40k but I wasn't too sure on their consistency.

@ Chrysis: Thats not too bad then, I'm just fed up of having to scrounge weapons from different sets.