Switch Theme:

Tau: Broadsides vs Hammerheads  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in gb
Possessed Khorne Marine Covered in Spikes





On a hate rampage.

So like many people, i'm starting up a Tau army due to their new codex and sexy models. I'm having trouble deciding what Heavy support to field in my larger list.

One Hammerhead gunship costs about the same points as two broadsides- but has a better tankbuster weapon.
Two broadsides dish out more firepower per turn, and I have melta weapons to deal with any particularly difficult armour

What would Dakka suggest i do-2 hammerheads, or 2 teams of 2 broadsides?

Sternguard never die
 
   
Made in us
Shrieking Traitor Sentinel Pilot





Depends on how tank heavy your meta is. By tank, i mean MBT, things you actually need the rail cannon for. Transports, IFVs, Trukks, the Broadsides are great. LRBT, LR, you need a hammerhead. I have traditionally used one broadside team 3x, 1 Hammerhead, and a full squad of sniper drones, but that was because I used to play Farsight, and he used to have unit restrictions.

   
Made in us
Aspirant Tech-Adept





St. Louis

I find missile sides to be far more versatile, They can pop light and medium armor and down infantry with ease as well.

If your meta has AV14 though the railhead is probably the way to go.

Then again, you can always do both, but if you take a railhead buy the submunition.
   
Made in fi
Longtime Dakkanaut




I don't honestly see much point in Hammerhead. If you expect facing lots of AV13/14, then your one or two Railgun shots probably won't do much against it anyway, so why bother at all?

Mr Vetock, give back my Multi-tracker! 
   
Made in us
Regular Dakkanaut





NE Ohio

If you're taking a rail head, Longstrike is as much as an auto upgrade as you can get. bs5 s10 ap1 w/ tankhunter. For other tank hunting I'd look more towards your fusion gun options rather than heavy support

Your basic Arachnid warrior isn't too smart, but you can blow off a limb, and it's still 86 percent combat effective. Here's a tip: Aim for the nerve stem, and put it down for good.  
   
Made in us
Water-Caste Negotiator



Phoenix, AZ

 MechaBeast wrote:
If you're taking a rail head, Longstrike is as much as an auto upgrade as you can get. bs5 s10 ap1 w/ tankhunter. For other tank hunting I'd look more towards your fusion gun options rather than heavy support


This.

Longstrike is always a must have if you take a railhead. I have been playing one hammerhead with Longstrike, and two missle-sides and they balance each other really well. But since you want one or the other and you already have melta to deal with things then missle-sides are the way to go.
   
Made in gb
Purposeful Hammerhead Pilot





To be honest since they new codex ive tended to run 3 submunition railheads as my heavy support at 1750 (or sometimes even 1500) with proper pathfinder support its very difficult to miss with them and they really do outperform broadsides imo
   
Made in us
Veteran Wolf Guard Squad Leader



DC Metro

I'm a big believer in the Missilefists. If you need to crack a Land Raider, send a Riptide. Either you red it out with the heavy burst cannon, crack it with the overcharged accelerator, fusion blaster it open, or just kick the thing two or three times at S10.
   
 
Forum Index » 40K General Discussion
Go to: