Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/06/06 18:08:37
Subject: Screamers Vs. Flyers/FMC
|
 |
Blood-Raging Khorne Berserker
|
Can they preform their move over and attack abilities against flyers? Any references would be great. Thank you ahead of time.
|
I need to return some video tapes.
Skulls for the Skull Throne |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/06/06 18:31:03
Subject: Screamers Vs. Flyers/FMC
|
 |
Been Around the Block
Delawhere?
|
Goat wrote:Can they preform their move over and attack abilities against flyers? Any references would be great. Thank you ahead of time.
Now that... is an interesting question.
I'd say no, but the rules are a little vague. The ruling is that any weapon that hits automatically can't target Flyers, but that references the Snap Shot rule so would be implied to refer to shooting attacks, not quasi- HtH attacks. A FMC can Vector Strike a flyer, but Screamers are Jetbikes. One would argue that since there are specific references to moving under a flyer but not over a flyer, Screamers can't do so and therefor can't use that attack, but then one could also argue that as semantics.
FAQ-worthy, but still, I'd say no if you asked me in a game.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/06/06 18:53:30
Subject: Re:Screamers Vs. Flyers/FMC
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
|
I would have to say no as there is nothing to override the hard to hit rule for a zooming flyer. You need a specific exception and there isn't one for Screamers.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/06/06 20:06:47
Subject: Re:Screamers Vs. Flyers/FMC
|
 |
Veteran Wolf Guard Squad Leader
Pacific NW
|
Considering they had to Errata the Vector Strike rules so that it said you could target Flyers specifically, I'm going to say no.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/06/07 00:02:13
Subject: Screamers Vs. Flyers/FMC
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
Vanished Completely
|
It is a very interesting clashing of two separate rules.
It has to get very rule lawyering to come to a negative conclusion. That argument would stem on the fact shots need to be resolved against a flyer, as per the hard to hit rule, as snapshots. Automatic-hitting attacks are not being resolved as snap shots, and hence can not meet the requirement to bypass hard to hit.
I think it is a little weak, but I don't see anything else that would prevent you from enacting Striking attack against a flyer. Turbo-boost clearly states you move over all other models, the model interaction rules for flyers has nothing disallowing something going overhead and the slashing attack restrictions doesn't prevent flyers from being targeted.
However it is more likely an overlooked situation and I wish we had more of a definitive FAQ answer then 'Yes' to a single situation when other abilities clearly have the same potential.
|
8th made it so I can no longer sway Tau onto the side of Chaos, but they will eventually turn aside from their idea of the Greater Good to embrace the Greatest of pleasures. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/06/07 00:08:15
Subject: Screamers Vs. Flyers/FMC
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
JinxDragon wrote:It has to get very rule lawyering to come to a negative conclusion. That argument would stem on the fact shots need to be resolved against a flyer, as per the hard to hit rule, as snapshots. Automatic-hitting attacks are not being resolved as snap shots, and hence can not meet the requirement to bypass hard to hit. I think it is a little weak, but I don't see anything else that would prevent you from enacting Striking attack against a flyer. Turbo-boost clearly states you move over all other models, the model interaction rules for flyers has nothing disallowing something going overhead and the slashing attack restrictions doesn't prevent flyers from being targeted. However it is more likely an overlooked situation and I wish we had more of a definitive FAQ answer then 'Yes' to a single situation when other abilities clearly have the same potential.
Let's be careful with the pejorative terms, please. It doesn't take much "rules lawyering" to read the FAQ: Q: How do maelstroms, novas and beams – or indeed any weapon that doesn’t need to roll To Hit or hits automatically – interact with Zooming Flyers and Swooping Flying Monstrous Creatures? (p13) A: Only Snap Shots can hit Zooming Flyers and Swooping Flying Monstrous Creatures. Therefore, any attacks that use blast markers, templates, create a line of/area of effect or otherwise don’t roll to hit cannot target them. This includes weapons such as the Necron Doom Scythe’s death ray or the Deathstrike missile of the Imperial Guard, and psychic powers that follow the rule for maelstroms, beams, and novas.
So unless you're arguing that the Screamers are somehow not making an attack, a negative answer is pretty straightforward.
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2013/06/07 00:08:59
Quis Custodiet Ipsos Custodes? |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/06/07 00:18:08
Subject: Screamers Vs. Flyers/FMC
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
Vanished Completely
|
Thanks, I do have a tendency to overlook some section or other and FAQ's are worse for that. That one you quoted answers the question quite clearly for the negative. It is a problem with some other auto-hit abilities in a handful of other situations as well, so that strengthens other arguments.
|
8th made it so I can no longer sway Tau onto the side of Chaos, but they will eventually turn aside from their idea of the Greater Good to embrace the Greatest of pleasures. |
|
 |
 |
|