Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

It makes more sense for their to be terrain as well, not that my groups recurring epic battle for Big-field-with-a-single-building- landia, isn't of vital importance, terrain can lead to some fun and diverse games. However, I would recommended being gentle on the mysterious terrain, I had a game where almost all of the buildings benefited my Skaven and did squat for my poor opponents high elves.

I say we fantasy players take the initiative and try to experiment with more terrain in our battles. I'll do my part to have a table next game that a non-psychopathic general would actually decide to fight for.

I have read some cool rules online for fighting in a forest, as in the entire table counts as soft cover, small units can give up their first turn to "Hide", cannons have to roll a 4+ to hit but can splinter trees, cool stuff like that and then whatever you can come up with.