| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
 |
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/07/09 16:20:42
Subject: IG allies for C:SM
|
 |
Terminator with Assault Cannon
|
I am toying with the idea of adding a small IG detachment to my C:SM army for larger games (1750+).
I think it's fluffy and I really want to model/paint some IG minis (tanks!).
I am thinking about a very cheap HQ and troop and putting all the points into a LRBT squadron. Then my SM would concentrate on nasty Elites. I can field just about any SM unit besides flyers, bikes, and TFC. I am not going to field TFCs until I find a good proxy and I just don't like the look of GW SM bikes.
So generally I am thinking
Librarian
Terminators
Assault Terminators
Scouts/Snipers
Land Speeders
Land Raider(s)
IG
Company HQ
Platoon (cheap)
2-3 LRBT
I have read most of a thread on LRBT squadrons and that they shouldn't be mixed. But I am wondering which variant would best compliment SM. I was thinking just vanilla LRBT for its versatility.
What have you seen or played with IG allies with C:SM primary detachment?
|
SickSix's Silver Skull WIP thread
My Youtube Channel
JSF wrote:... this is really quite an audacious move by GW, throwing out any pretext that this is a game and that its customers exist to do anything other than buy their overpriced products for the sake of it. The naked arrogance, greed and contempt for their audience is shocking. = Epic First Post.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/07/09 19:44:12
Subject: IG allies for C:SM
|
 |
Resolute Ultramarine Honor Guard
|
I'd use Demolishers on the LR, it supports your forward movement and is S10. And it doesn't suffer from the same side armor weaknesses that Vindicators do. (however, it's slower) Another good option might be the plasma vindicators. It all really depends on your meta; what do people play around you?
Also, if you are going to run IG as allies, I'd suggest getting a full 50man platoon. Throwing a Librarian in there makes them LD10 and ATSKNF, meaning you have a 50 man blob of angry humans who can't be swept.
|
warboss wrote:Is there a permanent stickied thread for Chaos players to complain every time someone/anyone gets models or rules besides them? If not, there should be. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/07/10 12:31:32
Subject: IG allies for C:SM
|
 |
Terminator with Assault Cannon
|
My local area has a lot of MEQ but also Orks, Tau, and a good Necron player.
I want the IG to be a detachment, a 50 man force is an army lol and starts cutting into my SM elites.
Cost is another factor. I want the tanks and not a whole lot else. A cadian battle force box would pretty much be all I need bsides the tanks right?
|
SickSix's Silver Skull WIP thread
My Youtube Channel
JSF wrote:... this is really quite an audacious move by GW, throwing out any pretext that this is a game and that its customers exist to do anything other than buy their overpriced products for the sake of it. The naked arrogance, greed and contempt for their audience is shocking. = Epic First Post.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/07/10 13:58:27
Subject: Re:IG allies for C:SM
|
 |
Kovnik
|
you can go cheaper than a whole battleforce. Lord Commissar, 2 boxes of cadian shock (as veterans) are roundabout 50$. Then you can add as many tanks as you want. Or a Vendetta. its cheap as chips and deadly. And you can put one of your vettroops with the commissar in it.
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2013/07/10 13:59:18
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
|