Switch Theme:

More Secondary Objectives?  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in us
Stalwart Veteran Guard Sergeant





Eastern US

With just about everything else in 6th edition being randomly generated or determined, it always struck me as odd that there are always three Secondary Objectives: Slay the Warlord, Line Breaker and First Blood.

Wouldn't it jive a bit better with the nature of 6th to have 6 Secondary Objectives with D3 of them being determined after rolling for deployment and mission?

All of the current ones make sense because every army has at least one HQ unit that gets designated as a Warlord, every army has a deployment zone and every army has units that can be killed, possibly before the other player.

What other options do you think there could be? Perhaps eliminating an entire Troops choice?

What does Dakka think?


"'Finished' is an unfulfilling endeavor that leaves a vast emptiness that can only be filled by the start of another project. I dread the finish." -The_Blackadder

Check out the Table Top Generals Podcast at www.ttgpodcast.podbean.com and on iTunes! 
   
Made in us
Legendary Master of the Chapter






Not really as the armies are going in to a confrontation with a goal in mind. and there are randomly /mostly anyway) generated secondary like legendary fighter, holy relic archeotech, killing certain characters (or not (SW)).


 Unit1126PLL wrote:
 Scott-S6 wrote:
And yet another thread is hijacked for Unit to ask for the same advice, receive the same answers and make the same excuses.

Oh my god I'm becoming martel.
Send help!

 
   
 
Forum Index » 40K Proposed Rules
Go to: