Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

Stupid Laptop.
Was writing a longish post and some error made me go back a page and lose it.

Anyway short ver.
Inq_Syph is now immune to night kills.
If he gets night killed then it proves he was right or at least on the right track.

But this could be fabrication by cultists.
Thats why I am waiting for a counter-argument first.

Inqusitor wrote:Their only reasoning was "we needed him more than GND"... which is false, since halo is a cultist.

Well there were five hours left and we needed to lynch someone. I stand by my decision to try and persuade people to not lynch Halo. He's been scum hunting etc and while he has done some suspicous things, and i'm keeping my eye out, I'd rather wait a day phase and get some more evidence first or stuff.

Ummm.... Inquisitor, can you reexplain that?

1. I was always after GND, just because I suspected him from the start, and I didn't have any backup until near the end, but I guess that's not really a good argument, because if I was a cultist, I guess it could've just been a distraction or something like that.

2. On the other hand, you wrote: "Halo delicately nudged to not vote for halo, which is why I think he is a daemon." Just a little clarification, maybe?

3. What exactly are the rookie mistakes Paul and I made?

Huh? What? Where was I?

Ohh that's right
Vote: Lanny

I should have kept voting for him, ohhwell.

OOC: What's a Black Guard?

Vampire Counts, I've had a promotion in rank!

Fantasy? Ewwwwww

Less bald screaming guys

Exactly. It's less fun. Everyone loves bald screaming guys, but we're getting off topic. Drk, why do you suspect Lanny again?

Am I off topic again?

Same as before. He's shifty. IIRC...

I figure this quotes good

Drk_Oblitr8r wrote:

Lord-Loss wrote:Can Drk_Oblit and IG summorise why they feel each other are suspicous.

Lanny is self contradictionary. One moment, he's making strong comments, the next, he's completely given up on the what he was talking about completely.

Lanny, I thought about it for a sec, then came up with a paradox...

Drk_Oblitr8r wrote:Vampire Counts, I've had a promotion in rank!

Off-topic I know but Black Guard are a Dark elf unit.

Well, to continue to be your definition of a paradox, I'll stick with my vote.

vote: Drk_O

IGLannister wrote:Well, to continue to be your definition of a paradox, I'll stick with my vote.

vote: Drk_O

No.

The paradox was that you were asking if you were off topic, which was off topic, but you were asking

Wait. I didn't think it through properly. lol. I might have been thinking paradox, ohh well

@Inquisitor_Syph:
What is your opinion of IGlannister?
Does he fit into your theory at all?

VikingScott wrote:

Drk_Oblitr8r wrote:Vampire Counts, I've had a promotion in rank!

Off-topic I know but Black Guard are a Dark elf unit.

I know, I said I got a promotion in rank

I noticed it about 40 mins ago, I think it meant "Black Knight"

Ok, cool. You're right. I'm still voting for you, but I misunderstood.

Actually, no.

unvote: Drk_O

vote: Vikingscott

I'm a little flustered with Viking not inputting anything, and simply being a reflection of what other players think.

Not inputting anything?
Read my posts, I am asking Inq_Syph questions on his accusations instead of blindly following them.

And what/where am I relfecting what others think?

You just moved several notches up the suspicion list.

VikingScott wrote:
Inq_Syph is now immune to night kills.
If he gets night killed then it proves he was right or at least on the right track.

But this could be fabrication by cultists.
Thats why I am waiting for a counter-argument first.

So IGlanister you do not call this input?
Sharing my thoughts with the group?

So either you are randomly voting.
Or have some grudge against me.
Or I am on the right track.
I am a citizen. Not a cultist.

TherVadam wrote:Ummm.... Inquisitor, can you reexplain that?

1. I was always after GND, just because I suspected him from the start, and I didn't have any backup until near the end, but I guess that's not really a good argument, because if I was a cultist, I guess it could've just been a distraction or something like that.

2. On the other hand, you wrote: "Halo delicately nudged to not vote for halo, which is why I think he is a daemon." Just a little clarification, maybe?

3. What exactly are the rookie mistakes Paul and I made?

Yay, immune to night kill!!!!

Anyhoo:

1.O.K., you're still shifty.

2.Oops, meant lord-loss delicately nudged not to vote for halo.

3.Paul kept going on about distratctions, and it is very clear that you, halo, and paul are cultists.

Lord-Loss... you're either very pro-town, or you're a daemon...

IGLannister:

Paul didn't need to include him, though he did, when he said something about halo and IGL being more important.

IGL has been just as shifty-more shifty as the rest of the cultists.

Halo has been way too careful not to rub anyone the wrong way. He is playing defensive, very defensive.

*Tries to salvage GND's burnt leather shoes*

Paul Atreides wrote:Yes, I would rather lose GND than I would IG or halo.

While they can be distracting, That is what makes them so important to us.

We need halo, not despite how loud he is, but because of it. Hell, I'm surprised he is one of the prime targets rather than me.

Awfully incriminating from my point of view, what do you need a distraction for?

Inquisitor_Syphonious' supect list:

Halonachos
Paul Atredies
TherVadam
IGLannister
Lord-Loss

Copy and pasted from word for 100% accuracy!

Kind of odd that Stynier was so logical and was scumhunting but then...oops, turned out to be a demon. Once again...what logic is being shown here?

As for Scott (or Viking? Which do you prefer?) it seems to me that while everyone is scumhunting, like Syphonius, or (...) stynier, you seem kind of peripheral. I take back my statement that you have no input. Let me restate. You do give input, but it's more or less along the lines of what other players are feeling at that point, so to me at least it seems like your input is slanted.

I'm going to reference Stynier yet again. I'm sure that many in here, do to my so brazenly and rudely going off topic for three posts, thought that stynier was a townie. I'm sure he was suspect to some, but do to our argument, many of you figured I was a baddy. Then, what's this, he gets zapped and bang, daemon. So, as I'm sure I've stated before, this thing is still, even now, a tossup. So let's all treat it as such, and not reason that we have this special insight as to the nature of the heretic.

^ Scott

So lanny got a counter-arguement?
Or do you realise that you were wrong in your thoughts of me not contributing?

@Inq_Syph you haven't answered my question although you acknowledged the post it was in.

And please, call me Lann.

IGLannister? He is in my theory.

@IGL...

BrotherStynier was logical, though he wasn't scum hunting.

He was really just pretending to scum hunt.

He was voting for people that he knew were citizens (AFAIK)

He was flying under the radar, waiting to night-kill.

You should know, since he possessed you.

Bah! Ninja'd. Lann.

So, first I was voted for going off topic.

Then I was a suspected cultist.

Now Im IG_Stynier.

Okey-dokey. Your guys logic has worked out so far...