Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

@Inq_Syph.
How do you know that IGLan is possessed?
Any proof or just gut feeling?

I'm confused..... what did I do again?

BTW how old are you Lann?

If I was going to possess someone, I think it would be someone who was similarly vocal to me. Based on that logic, if we want to find Stynier's possessee, we should think of people who were posting a similar amount to him...

He might possess someone very chatty, but it seems unlikely he would possess someone who has not been chatting very much.

Also, I would be likely to possess someone who didn't vote last time, so that I could make them vote this time (He can do that, right?) and not lose someone else's vote from the pile of votes.

So, I think someone who was chatty last time and who didn't vote is probably the possessee.

Well.... it's not me. *Shifts eyes back and forth*

Lan you have until I get back from my meeting to give me a reply.
If you haven't then I have good cause to vote for you.

24. Why? And if stynier has possessed someone, we should see a rant about off topic discussion. So when we see that, well know who to go for.

See that ghost-stynier? Off topic evidence ftw.

And Scott, I gave you a reply. Look for it.

Oh man, I was lucky as hell. I was up in a hospital getting a chest x-ray done so I missed my chance to vote and to defend myself.

It also feels good to be needed, but syphonius is really aggressive right now. I don't know what changed, but he seems to be on some great offensive right now. Seeing as though a lot of people rushed to my defence(me being one of the more suspicious people) they all seem guilty of being in a group with me.

If what fifty says is true then I would put the possesse as either LL or bishop. In one of my earlier posts I noted a similarity in play style among stynier, LL, and bishop so it is very possible that the latter two are now possessed by our now-dead demon. I would also like to point out that within the last few pages both bishop and stynier condemmed the OT posts of Lann and I.

So, my bet is that stynier is possessing LL because he would want the same play style, but not the closesly related anti-OT voting. That is of course, just a guess.

Also, syphonius could be possessed and targeting the most suspicious people of the last day phase and those who didn't vote for a member of the most suspicious people list.

Like I said, syphonius had a huge attitude change and LL is my best bet on the person who was possessed. Bishop is also a possible target, but I think that if stynier is smart he will avoid a possesse that is too similar to him.

Who said IGStynier?

Anyhoo:

My feelings have been that the first day is useless, and that the second is where to get down and dirty. That is the mood "change".

Scott still seems like scott, nice small posts. We will have to see if he continues to fold under pressure from one person though. If he does then its still scott.

Fifty hasn't given too much character so that will be hard to tell. However, his hinting about who a demon should possess(notice he listed characteristics he didnt have) is also iffy. We will have to watch his regularity.

IG is still acting the same(no large posts).

Vadam is new so there is little character to go on if he is possessed we possibly wouldn't know it.

Paul, ferret, and scarper have given us very little to go on in terms of identity.

Syhponius has gotten a lot more aggressive in his posts.

Bishop is still attacking LL and LL is still defending in their own private war.

Drk_O has remained Drk_O, but he talked a lot so his chances are small.

It's called irony, syph.

To Lann: My friend grew up in Portland and is moving back to Portland. If you were the same age as we were, I would want you to continue my efforts to convince him to play Imp Guard, alas...

On topic, however, somehow, now that Syphonius is taking such an offensive, I feel I am taking a back seat somewhat, and don't have much to say other than defending myself. Isn't that what happened to Halonachos or someone during day one though? That they were speaking too much, and others felt they were taking a back seat? Oh well, just my ramblings of the day...

Also, what about Karon's role? Isn't anyone worried about that, as chances are, they're scum (considering there's what, 3 pro-town roles), which means another new person. Hm.... although the only person that I feel is definitely not the new scum, is Inquisitor_Syphonius, as most people would try to continue in the same way as before, instead of gigantic changes.

Don't you have to be Pysky (spell?) guy to be possesed?

I'm not possesed.

I see the big difference in Inqusitiors game style and it makes me... suspicous.

Scott has actually been scum hunting since the begining of Day Two, so I don't see any votes against his currently (He did some suspicous stuff on Day One but not enough for a Vote) as being pro-town.

I don't know why Bishop is attacking me, he's probally jealous of my charm & wit!

Inqusitior@ You've claimed that Lann is possesed and Nachos is a cultist, just like that. There's no might or probally. You could only know if someone is a cultist if you were an Inqusitior and it's currently not possible to know who Styner possesed. I think, would it come up on an Inqusitiors investigation during the night phase N0t_u?. But anyway, are you admiting to be an Inqusitior?

Vadam@ I didn't think that the change in Inqusitiors playstyle could be down to a role change. That's a possibly of course and the town will have to look out for change in playstyles.

Dude, to be perfectly honest, i don't care how old your friend is, no one will hook up with me to play ):

Tell your broseph to gimme a call, dude, I'll gladly convince him to Go Guard.

Furthermore, can everyone who STILL thinks I'm a heretic please stand up? And by that I mean announce it, so I can know whose faces to rub it in when They finally realize I'm just a humble serf.

Alright, but my "broseph" is 14...

To Lord-Loss: I was saying that I thought it was impossible that Inquisitor got the role change, because it would be so obvious to change directly after a role change.

Also, it was less Go Guard as much as it was "You should play Warhammer 40k, there's a faction you would love called Imp Guard!"

Inquisitor_Syphonious, I am not surprised that you suspect me.

In your seat, I would probably suspect me too.

I know I have nothing but my word of honour, but I will still say, for what it's worth,that my actions were based on noobplay and gut feeling. But my stupidity cost the town greatly, and I could full well understand if you would like to see lynched.

Uh....Uh?

What did you do again Paul?

I participated in the lynching of the now proven innocent GND, remember?

Well you usualy end up lynching a townie on Day One, you try your best but you shouldn't beat yourself up when it happens.

You are right. Even as we speak, this tragic mistake is transforming from an embarrasing failure into a learning experience.

halonachos wrote:Fifty hasn't given too much character so that will be hard to tell. However, his hinting about who a demon should possess(notice he listed characteristics he didnt have) is also iffy. We will have to watch his regularity.

Well, the simple fact I am now posting twice in the same day is a massive change in regularity for this game, but if you look at previous games you'll find I normally post a lot.

To be honest, this game only just got interesting. Prior to the night-phase, all there seemed to be was a lot of noise.

I also have a history of trying to get rid of people I think are bad for the game... (I wanted Arheiner DM-killed in a previous game.) This time, I thnk I'd like to see IGLannister gone. I don't think he makes the game fun with his attitude. That is almost enough to make me vote for him. Make of that what you will, wrt suddenly disliking off-topic or otherwise, but I had already said I don't much like him, IIRC.

Lord-Loss wrote:Uh....Uh?

What did you do again Paul?

He also said that you guys needed me in the game.

As far as syphonius goes, I don't know what he's doing. It would still be dangerous to even jest at being an inquisitor as we most likely still have a full cultist number and a rogue-psyker that can work against them that is still around 4-5 votes so...

Also, we still have some remaining demons that will up the vote count to well, past majority thanks to the players that were kicked out. In fact, instead of losing 2 players(stynier and GND) we lost 4. So instead of 17 we now have 13 players, majority would be 7. Also, we can count the possessed player as a chaos player so that means there are only; wait, some speculation and math.

Cultists=4
Demons=2-1=1+1(possession)=2
Rogue psyker=1

Total baddies=7
Total players=13
Players-baddies=6
Townies=6

So that means that we now have a greater chance of hitting anti-town than pro-town.
Although it mean that the anti-town has a greater chance of winning.

Also, I think we could pen up syphonius's newfound aggression due to possession. Although, I would rather wait for the inquisitor to banish stynier from his body just in case because I suspect LL and bishop more of possession.

IGLannister wrote:And Scott, I gave you a reply. Look for it.

I found it after looking back.

Funnily enough in a post than proir didn't have it.
By that I mean edited.
There is no note saying why it was edited.

IGLannister wrote:As for Scott (or Viking? Which do you prefer?) it seems to me that while everyone is scumhunting, like Syphonius, or (...) stynier, you seem kind of peripheral. I take back my statement that you have no input. Let me restate. You do give input, but it's more or less along the lines of what other players are feeling at that point, so to me at least it seems like your input is slanted.

I'm going to reference Stynier yet again. I'm sure that many in here, do to my so brazenly and rudely going off topic for three posts, thought that stynier was a townie. I'm sure he was suspect to some, but do to our argument, many of you figured I was a baddy. Then, what's this, he gets zapped and bang, daemon. So, as I'm sure I've stated before, this thing is still, even now, a tossup. So let's all treat it as such, and not reason that we have this special insight as to the nature of the heretic.

^ Scott

This post.
Was edited without a given reason. Thats a breach of the rules.

So ok I got a reply.
Still voting for me I see.

VOTE: IGLannister

For I think even if he is town it will make scum hunting easier.

More proof that it was edited is that my post directly after doesn't make too much sense.
As if i didn't read the prior post. Which I did.

Hm... Lann is starting to look more and more suspicious. I guess I made the wrong decision when I tried to protect him. My new protege is...... VikingScott!

Meanwhile, Vote: IGLannister

Ok...wait, I didn't get that. How did I violate the rules this time?