Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

Your post was edited.

Twice without something like eg: EDITED for spelling

So let me get this straight. You asked me to clarify why I was voting for you, which I did. Then I told you it was edited in a separate post, and to go find it. Which you did. I laid out why I was voting on you, saying (roughly) that your vote was swayed rather easily by others.

Then, after I did as bid, you vote for for me to be lynched based on the fact that I neglected to edit my post, and that you didn't like my answer. Therefore, Scott, what good would it do for anyone to answer your questions?

Allow me to further state why I'm suspicious of you Scott. You ask Syph where if fit into his plan. If I was suspicious, why? Then Drk_O votes for me. Which is cool, we've been voting for each other on and off the entire game.

However, just a few posts later you're giving me the ultimatum to answer your query or get voted for. TBH, I think you're trying to jump on to someone elses vote.

We should stop the Lan Bandwagon here before it gets bigger.

Just cause you find someone suspicous, there is no need to vote.

Fifty, I don't think thats a very good reason to want Lan lynched and it's not pro-town to wanna lynch someone cause you dislike 'em.

OK, that's fair. I was being a little rash.

Unvote: IGLannister

Lord Loss, for some reason every post you make is automatically ignored. Did I press a wrong button or something? What's going on here?

Go to your profile and check if you added me to ignore list. You can remove me there, if you want to.

Thanks. Dunno why you were in there.

OCC: I go to a Iron Maiden concert then turn up dead, great.

DEATH POST

Ah the foolish cultists think they've ended me... They've done nothing that hasn't already been planned...

OOC: Away for a few days.

Wow Lann,you were right. If you're innocent, hell even if you're a cultist, I vote you to get some kind of medal. No other one here has been bandwagoned as much as him, even if they were only radioflyer size bandwagons.

Lord-Loss wrote:1.Don't you have to be Pysky (spell?) guy to be possesed?

2.I'm not possesed.

3.I see the big difference in Inqusitiors game style and it makes me... suspicous.

4.Scott has actually been scum hunting since the begining of Day Two, so I don't see any votes against his currently (He did some suspicous stuff on Day One but not enough for a Vote) as being pro-town.

5.I don't know why Bishop is attacking me, he's probally jealous of my charm & wit!

6.Inqusitior@ You've claimed that Lann is possesed and Nachos is a cultist, just like that. There's no might or probally. You could only know if someone is a cultist if you were an Inqusitior and it's currently not possible to know who Styner possesed. I think, would it come up on an Inqusitiors investigation during the night phase N0t_u?. But anyway, are you admiting to be an Inqusitior?

1. Heresy! Everyone knows how to spell psyker.

2. I know, it was a good try though!

3. I've already explained this.

4. Meh, no one to scum hunt on day one, since all the suspicious stuff happened after my last view on day one.

5. I am too!

6. I don't know who is possessed, just a 100% accurate guess! (Just kidding. ) I am just reading through the patters as to who is a cultist and why.

IGLannister wrote:Dude, to be perfectly honest, i don't care how old your friend is, no one will hook up with me to play ):

Tell your broseph to gimme a call, dude, I'll gladly convince him to Go Guard.

Furthermore, can everyone who STILL thinks I'm a heretic please stand up? And by that I mean announce it, so I can know whose faces to rub it in when They finally realize I'm just a humble serf.

HERESY!

Paul Atreides wrote:Inquisitor_Syphonious, I am not surprised that you suspect me.

In your seat, I would probably suspect me too.

I know I have nothing but my word of honour, but I will still say, for what it's worth,that my actions were based on noobplay and gut feeling. But my stupidity cost the town greatly, and I could full well understand if you would like to see lynched.

Nope, still think you're too suspicious to not be a cultist.

Lord-Loss wrote:Uh....Uh?

What did you do again Paul?

Same thing as TherVadam (and a 'lil by IG)...

I am 99.9999996% sure on my conclusions, c'mon! They all just... just... look!

In response to LL's post, you can be a cultist or a psyker to get possessed IIRC.

In all reality, I don't think syphonius is the inquisitor. though, I think he's the psyker or maybe a cultist. I see his attacks on me and the others as a blatant attempt to use the suspicions of day 1 to coerce us to believe that he is the inquisitor.

His actions so far seem different from before (which he said is due to this being day two), but I don't believe that to be true. The math points to the heretics being almost the majority(if my guess on the roles is correct) so if he lists 4 or 5 guys there's a chance one of them will be a heretic. If one of them is voted and turns cultist then it will seem as if he's the inquisitor.

The fact that the anti-town most likely have the majority means that the inquisitor will not reveal themselves if they are smart.

He's possessed, I'm completely sure of it. Whether or not he's pro-town is unknown. I will not put my vote towards him until the demon in him is banished because of my thinking of the scenario.

Syphonius is possessed and declares himself inquisitor and chooses the top 4 suspicious townies. Everyone votes the townie out and during the night phase, another townie is killed. While the town wants to get rid of syphonius, they don't have the votes and then are guaranteed a loss as 4 cultists remain and only 4 townies remain. There are still two players on the demon team(if the real inquisitor has failed to banish stynier) and this leaves the rogue psyker(whom I believe will not be possessed in interest of the demons wanting as many anti-town alive as possible).

Day 2 will end with 7 anti-town and 4 pro-town. The cultists quickly vote out one townie and night kill another player, end of game.

Don't vote syphonius, let the inquisitor banish stynier from him.

halonachos wrote:In response to LL's post, you can be a cultist or a psyker to get possessed IIRC.

In all reality, I don't think syphonius is the inquisitor. though, I think he's the psyker or maybe a cultist. I see his attacks on me and the others as a blatant attempt to use the suspicions of day 1 to coerce us to believe that he is the inquisitor.

His actions so far seem different from before (which he said is due to this being day two), but I don't believe that to be true. The math points to the heretics being almost the majority(if my guess on the roles is correct) so if he lists 4 or 5 guys there's a chance one of them will be a heretic. If one of them is voted and turns cultist then it will seem as if he's the inquisitor.

The fact that the anti-town most likely have the majority means that the inquisitor will not reveal themselves if they are smart.

He's possessed, I'm completely sure of it. Whether or not he's pro-town is unknown. I will not put my vote towards him until the demon in him is banished because of my thinking of the scenario.

Syphonius is possessed and declares himself inquisitor and chooses the top 4 suspicious townies. Everyone votes the townie out and during the night phase, another townie is killed. While the town wants to get rid of syphonius, they don't have the votes and then are guaranteed a loss as 4 cultists remain and only 4 townies remain. There are still two players on the demon team(if the real inquisitor has failed to banish stynier) and this leaves the rogue psyker(whom I believe will not be possessed in interest of the demons wanting as many anti-town alive as possible).

Day 2 will end with 7 anti-town and 4 pro-town. The cultists quickly vote out one townie and night kill another player, end of game.

Don't vote syphonius, let the inquisitor banish stynier from him.

Why do you think I am possessed?

/shrugs

Cultist.

How often do the townies win these?

Cultist.

EDIT-Spelling...

OOC I was gone a day, watching for the other ones.

This is all very.... loud, isn't it? I find your actions.... Garish Mr nachoes. I don't think you understand the odds of.... luck. Time to vote town and vote you off Nachoes.

IGLannister wrote:So let me get this straight. You asked me to clarify why I was voting for you, which I did. Then I told you it was edited in a separate post, and to go find it. Which you did. I laid out why I was voting on you, saying (roughly) that your vote was swayed rather easily by others.

Then, after I did as bid, you vote for for me to be lynched based on the fact that I neglected to edit my post, and that you didn't like my answer. Therefore, Scott, what good would it do for anyone to answer your questions?

The point is that you edited your post without giving a reason which is against the rules.

Then I told you it was edited in a seperate post

Key word here is edited.

and that you didn't like my answer.

Your answer was that you retracted your staement about me not inputting and claim that I just follow people. I didn''t say that I didn't like it but you assume that as I'm voting for you.
I can't even remember the question but your answer and you still voting for me doesn't match up.

However, just a few posts later you're giving me the ultimatum to answer your query or get voted for. TBH, I think you're trying to jump on to someone elses vote.

The ultimatum was because you were online and it was possible for you to type a quick reply. You even had several post before actually acknowledging my post.

the_ferrett wrote:This is all very.... loud, isn't it? I find your actions.... Garish Mr nachoes. I don't think you understand the odds of.... luck. Time to vote town and vote you off Nachoes.

A little testy eh Mr. Ferrett?

I will answer syphonius first. He is either possessed or he's a cultist hiding behind large targets. "Halonachos is suspicious" is a relatively safe way to cast a vote as I was one of the top suspects in the beginning of the game.

I also see ferrett defending him which means that ferrett may also be a demon trying to tow the party line. I rubbed him the wrong way by guessing that Syphonius was possessed, the way ferrett quickly pounced on voting me off almost proves my suspicions.

The possibilities I can see is that Stynier is trying to get Syphonius killed and Syphonius is a pro-town psyker. Stynier is trying to make it seem like Syphonius is the inquisitor. Syphonius was a cultist and should be killed anyways.

Like I said, the rapid defense of the new syphonius by ferrett makes me think that ferrett is also a demon and that syphonius is possessed. Ferrett and syphonius were distant during day one, but this new found alliance is a little fishy in my opinion.

The only issue I have is what do we do with them. If we lynch ferrett then he can possess another player and hunt begins anew, if we lynch syphonius we release stynier to possess another player(Is that how it works Not_U?. All in all I am favoring a no lynch at the moment so the inquisitor can banish ferrett or stynier from syphonius during the night.

Vote: No Lynch

halonachos wrote:

the_ferrett wrote:This is all very.... loud, isn't it? I find your actions.... Garish Mr nachoes. I don't think you understand the odds of.... luck. Time to vote town and vote you off Nachoes.

A little testy eh Mr. Ferrett?

I will answer syphonius first. He is either possessed or he's a cultist hiding behind large targets. "Halonachos is suspicious" is a relatively safe way to cast a vote as I was one of the top suspects in the beginning of the game.

I also see ferrett defending him which means that ferrett may also be a demon trying to tow the party line. I rubbed him the wrong way by guessing that Syphonius was possessed, the way ferrett quickly pounced on voting me off almost proves my suspicions.

The possibilities I can see is that Stynier is trying to get Syphonius killed and Syphonius is a pro-town psyker. Stynier is trying to make it seem like Syphonius is the inquisitor. Syphonius was a cultist and should be killed anyways.

Like I said, the rapid defense of the new syphonius by ferrett makes me think that ferrett is also a demon and that syphonius is possessed. Ferrett and syphonius were distant during day one, but this new found alliance is a little fishy in my opinion.

The only issue I have is what do we do with them. If we lynch ferrett then he can possess another player and hunt begins anew, if we lynch syphonius we release stynier to possess another player(Is that how it works Not_U?. All in all I am favoring a no lynch at the moment so the inquisitor can banish ferrett or stynier from syphonius during the night.

Vote: No Lynch

Silly silly halonachos.

No lynch to try to play innocent? Very big mistake...

Anyone else see that as a sham?

Hiding behind targets? Nope, I pretty much painted one on my face, while you didn't make the biggest mistake, your friends did, and you still made some slight errors.

Such as:

*Takes position*

*Offends someone*

*Takes another postition*

Rinse wash and repeat.

Ferrett wasn't rushing to my aid, he simply y'know, can piece together that you and your trifecta are cultists. He sees that my posts make sense.

Me and Ferrett talked on vassal! (Not about the game)

Now to the obligatory:

Heretical!

Disclaimer:

I am not possessed.





Anyhoo:

Why would Stynier pick me to be possessed?

Even if he did pick to possess me, why would I take such an offensive all of a sudden?

Voting No Lynch is not pro town. Please take it off before I pressure vote you.

It's not good for the town.

I don't like the way Ferrett plays, he isn't scum hunting or contributing. He's just speaking in riddles and voting without giving a reason. I'd support a end of Day Two Ferrett Lynch.

Why would stynier choose to possess you, hmmm.

1) You had little or no ties to people in this game.

2) While you were vocal, you weren't as vocal.

3) LL and Bishop would be obvious choices for stynier to possess and would be eyed with suspicion because of that fact.

4) Vadem, Fifty, and Paul didnt say too much and gave little character to base an opinion off of. Fifty and Paul especially, their lack of talking is way off of styniers style and they have continued the same style.

5)I would say that Drk_O and I both have unique styles when it comes to posting so it would be hard for stynier to replicate.

6) Ferrett talked too little and his recent quick defense of you showed that there is a connection of some sort between you two in the game.

7) LL, Bishop, and I talked way too much. This makes us safe in terms of night kills or possession.

8) Stynier talked in an amount similar to you and was night-killed. I think that the anti-town are aiming for those in the middle of the chat-meter. People who talk too much have many enemies and a night kill of one of them will expose the cultists, a possession of someone who talked too much makes it difficult for the possesser to mimic their actions. Night killing people who rarely talk implicates those who talk too much and those who don't talk may be obvious choices for possession because it's too easy to mimic.

Perhaps you are the demon and ferrett was possessed?

And yes you ARE hiding behind targets.

Inquisitor_Syphonius wrote:Inquisitor_Syphonious' supect list:

Halonachos
Paul Atredies
TherVadam
IGLannister
Lord-Loss

Congratulations, you suspect 3 of the most talkative people(IG, LL, and I), the new guy, and someone who has not talked but 3 or 4 times. Why don't you just throw bishop up on that list as well.

Not only that, but I never saw you even chance putting ferrett into the spotlight, not even during this second day of trial. He fits your suspect list fairly well and has managed to slip past your suspicions, oh wait...

I think I know who you suspect, anybody who voted for GND. He popped negative for corruption and that makes it blatantly obvious that anybody who voted for him or supported me are cultists.

Those choices are incredbily obvious and incredibly safe, too safe for anyone with the town in mind. Like another person said: the chances are that during day one we will lynch a townie, yet it seems that you are using the day one results to form the basis of your vote. What I am getting though is that you are now promoting the wholesale slaughter of anybody who voted against GND.

As to why you would take a sudden offensive is simple. You are the pro-town psyker and syphonius wants you offed so he's going to make you as big a target as possible.

LL, the only reason I have a "no lynch" vote is because I don't have a ready idea of who is a cultist now and I am sure as hell not going to lynch suspected demons and let them possess someone else just to go on another chase.

halonachos wrote:
Those choices are incredbily obvious and incredibly safe, too safe for anyone with the town in mind. Like another person said: the chances are that during day one we will lynch a townie, yet it seems that you are using the day one results to form the basis of your vote. What I am getting though is that you are now promoting the wholesale slaughter of anybody who voted against GND.

I would like to say that i reached a similar conclusion but only posted that I wasn't going to blindly follow Inq_Syph.
And then ask him how he was so sure.
(If I actually didn't ask this then I am asking it now )

So sure about which though, suspicion of GND(you did ask about that as did I) or his conclusion about me?

I meant conclusion about his list of heretics.
It sounds plausible but i don't think its as black and white as he thinks.

I think Stynier is just trying to get him killed or Syphonius is trying to get himself killed. My votes for the demon team stand at syphonius and Ferrett.

My cultist votes will remain anonymous as I want to see how this goes.

halonachos wrote:Why would stynier choose to possess you, hmmm.

1) You had little or no ties to people in this game.

2) While you were vocal, you weren't as vocal.

3) LL and Bishop would be obvious choices for stynier to possess and would be eyed with suspicion because of that fact.

4) Vadem, Fifty, and Paul didnt say too much and gave little character to base an opinion off of. Fifty and Paul especially, their lack of talking is way off of styniers style and they have continued the same style.

5)I would say that Drk_O and I both have unique styles when it comes to posting so it would be hard for stynier to replicate.

6) Ferrett talked too little and his recent quick defense of you showed that there is a connection of some sort between you two in the game.

7) LL, Bishop, and I talked way too much. This makes us safe in terms of night kills or possession.

8) Stynier talked in an amount similar to you and was night-killed. I think that the anti-town are aiming for those in the middle of the chat-meter. People who talk too much have many enemies and a night kill of one of them will expose the cultists, a possession of someone who talked too much makes it difficult for the possesser to mimic their actions. Night killing people who rarely talk implicates those who talk too much and those who don't talk may be obvious choices for possession because it's too easy to mimic.

Perhaps you are the demon and ferrett was possessed?

And yes you ARE hiding behind targets.

Inquisitor_Syphonius wrote:Inquisitor_Syphonious' supect list:

Halonachos
Paul Atredies
TherVadam
IGLannister
Lord-Loss

1. Congratulations, you suspect 3 of the most talkative people(IG, LL, and I), the new guy, and someone who has not talked but 3 or 4 times. Why don't you just throw bishop up on that list as well.

2. Not only that, but I never saw you even chance putting ferrett into the spotlight, not even during this second day of trial. He fits your suspect list fairly well and has managed to slip past your suspicions, oh wait...

3. I think I know who you suspect, anybody who voted for GND. He popped negative for corruption and that makes it blatantly obvious that anybody who voted for him or supported me are cultists.

4. Those choices are incredbily obvious and incredibly safe, too safe for anyone with the town in mind. Like another person said: the chances are that during day one we will lynch a townie, yet it seems that you are using the day one results to form the basis of your vote. What I am getting though is that you are now promoting the wholesale slaughter of anybody who voted against GND.

5. As to why you would take a sudden offensive is simple. You are the pro-town psyker and syphonius wants you offed so he's going to make you as big a target as possible.

1) No one does but you and your cultists.

2) Just because I don't blabber up a storm doesn't mean I am not vocal! As I have explained many times before this, the first day is sillyness, second day is getting your hands dirty.

3) Bwahaha! Why would they be obvious now?

4) So as you put it, they would be perfect candidates, since they're not obvious.

4a) Your points 3 and 4 contradict each other.

5) I don't think that is how possession works, I may be mistaken though. So don't quote me on it!

6) No. I re-iterate, he read it, and saw that you and your gang are cultists.

7) I agree that you're talkative!

8) You seem to know alot about cultists eh? I have been talking alot too, don't know what thread you've been reading.

Or, neither of us are daemons? /shrug

Who? Accusing the lead heretic is not very conductive for well-being...

1. Talkative doesn't mean helpful. At all. (ie: halonachos) BishopGore has nothing to be suspicious of.

2. Why. Why does he fit in my list of suspects?

3. Nope, I suspect the people that protected you while voting for GND. Hell, just the people that protected you, since you seem to be getting in alot of trouble.

4. I like the wholesale slaughter of heretics.

5. Are you talking to me? I thought you said I was possessed, then it was daemon, now I am a psyker? I know I was on the sign-up sheet twice, but c'mon!