Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

Well thus far, BT would be the ONLY army to have a place in the Allies chart and be a Supplement.

And Blood Angels are less diverse than BT. They have 4 different units since their update, excluding characters. BT have 3.

Fluff-wise, we're either the most divergent or joint 1st with SW. And all of the "Less SM books" won't happen. If they recall the BT Codex and replace it with a Supplement, there will still be just as many SM books.

 phatonic wrote:
Well it's sadly been confirmed... BT are into the SM codex.. but not as a supplment.
http://apocalypse40k.blogspot.co.uk/2013/08/new-space-marine-details-courtesy-of.html

Hrrmm, I'll wait until I hear it from the horse's mouth. Plus rolling them into the SM book doesn't fit with the whole "Price hike and sell everything at a months rent and your first-born child". It's all a case of what can they sell that'll be more expensive.

And if we do, WHY THE HELL ARE THE TEMPLARS COPPING THE FLAK?!?! Bunch o' slack-jawed sacks of monkey-gak. F rs