Should be possible, there is distinction with capitals. Example: to /
TO
However I would think it's a bad idea simply because of the number of people who do term it "wrong", which will only help to confuse matters. If both show up, then context should make it clear which is being referred to.
sirlynchmob's method of rolling up to the model's number of wounds, resolving those, then continuing with more batches/single rolls if the model is still alive works quite nicely.
Another way you *COULD* work it is what I do, which is to state that you're going to roll all at once but begin taking results from the left, and if the character dies you ignore the remaining rolls and treat them as normal Wounds instead.
Example - I have an
IC with 2 wounds at the front of a unit that takes 8 wounds. Let's assume that both the
IC and the unit have a save against the wounds.
I roll the following for
LOS!:
1...2...1...5...1...1...6...3
A very unlucky roll

So I resolve the first wound against the
IC, let's say he fails. Next wound passed
LOS!, so goes to the nearest model who passes. The third wound resolves against the
IC and unluckily he fails it again. All
LOS! results are discarded and the remaining dice I've scooped up tell me I have 5 ordinary saves left to make.
Once you get practiced with this method it speeds it up greatly, but it DOES take a bit of practice and you have to agree it with your opponent first, since although accurate it has absolutely *NO* basis in rules.