Switch Theme:

New SM Special Characters  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in us
Crushing Black Templar Crusader Pilot






This is a bit premature since the new codex is not out yet but apparently 40k radio have their hands on a new SM codex and one item caught my attention:

"a descendant chapter cannot use their parent chapter special character"

and

Q: In 5th Edition you were encouraged to use SCs as "Count-As" special characters to give you some new/interesting combinations. Is there anything in the new book that allows you to do this?
A: You can no longer do that due to Chapter Tactics.


How would you guys interpret this in terms of "home-brewed" chapters? For example: my SM chapter is themed around "the hidden descendants of the Black Templars", I call them the Crusaders, I use BT icons but a green/white/black paint-scheme. It seems that under the new rules I wouldn't be allowed to use Grimaldus or Hellbrecht or the Emperor's Champion for that matter, not even "counts-as" since that's also not allowed apparently... If that's true it kinda blows... What am I gonna do? Repaint everything to BTs?
It seems to really hinder the creativity and freedom that made SMs fun to build as an army.

What do you guys think?
   
Made in br
Hooded Inquisitorial Interrogator





I think you are panicking, this Q&A is very incomplete.

My interpretation is "no mixing SC of differente chapters". This blows also.
   
Made in gb
Bounding Assault Marine



hereford

I would say your army can have all the units of its parent chapter and the SC rules with a different modle and use count as I think it is so I can't use Cato scarius with vulkan he'stan.

sallies all the way

"Into the fires of battle unto the anvil of war."
War-cry of the salamanders
"Vulkans fire beats in my breast with it I shall smite the foes of the Emperor."
war-cry of the firedrakes and chapter command  
   
Made in us
Daemonic Dreadnought






AL

While i don't think it's entirely a bad idea, I'm really just upset that there is STILL no Iron Hands SC

Gods? There are no gods. Merely existences, obstacles to overcome.

"And what if I told you the Wolves tried to bring a Legion to heel once before? What if that Legion sent Russ and his dogs running, too ashamed to write down their defeat in Imperial archives?" - ADB 
   
Made in gb
Bounding Assault Marine



hereford

I agree seeing the new trait system it seems that unless you field a chapter with a SC your losing out I think iron hands might get a supplement as Thay have alegedy gave them nothing different.

sallies all the way

"Into the fires of battle unto the anvil of war."
War-cry of the salamanders
"Vulkans fire beats in my breast with it I shall smite the foes of the Emperor."
war-cry of the firedrakes and chapter command  
   
 
Forum Index » 40K Proposed Rules
Go to: