A couple weeks ago while sitting in a boring job, I was comparing Ork Deff Koptas and War Buggies. One thing that ended up coming out of it is a chart I drew up that compared the To Wound or Armor Pen roll needed versus the vehicle armor and toughness of the shot-at unit. I ended up concluding that Toughness is roughly equal to an AV of 4 points higher. (It takes a Str 6 weapon a 4+ to Glance on 10 AV, and a 4+ to wound on Toughness 6, and so on.)
There are several important notes to this including creatures are slightly more liable to hurt by smaller arms fire (to wound pattern is 6+, 6+, 5+, 4+ vs to pen is -, 6+, 5+, 4+) and creatures are "safer" from Str 10 weapons (which will auto-pen/glance AV 10/11 but will still fail to wound on a 2+).
This makes comparisons between Monstrous Creatures and Vehicles more easily made when considering the number of wounds and hull points as well as the "effective toughness" of the model. However, the fact that vehicles can be destroyed in one hit via the Explosion result, and the difficulty of giving a vehicle any save at all renders them significantly more fragile that that of monstrous creatures.
How accurate would you say these conclusions are? Is there much of a saving grace to vehicles considering how fragile they are in comparison to creatures?
|