Switch Theme:

is the 40k save system wrong?  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in au
Purposeful Hammerhead Pilot






Newcastle, NSW ,Australia

If you want to make the saves system more logical, then why not roll to hit, then roll saving throws, any failed save then roll to see if they wound the model.

Because you can't be wounded if you armour does its job and stops you getting hurt.

To you original question about bolters getting through force shield but las cannons not. If you have ever watched Stargate SG-1, the Gould shields are responsive to only attacks that deal a high amount of force like a gun, but you can throw a knife through them because the knife doesn't hit with a lot if force.

Or they can choose when to activate their shields in 40k
 
Forum Index » 40K General Discussion
Go to: