Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

Coteaz's Wargear has "psyber-eagle" listed in it. However, upon perusing the book, I can find no other reference to this piece of wargear. I know what GK Coteaz's eagle has for a profile; can someone point me to a page in this book?

Edit: Upon doing a word search, there are two places the word "eagle" shows up: in Coteaz's fluff, and listed in his wargear. There don't seem to be rules for it in the book! Thanks GW!

I checked both of the versions I downloaded. You are right the weapon's profile is not listed. I would'nt hold my breath waiting for a fix. My guess is with the number of supplements and digital codices the games team is producing they don't have nearly as much time to go back and fix things.

It's listed in the iBooks version.
Just press the Psyber-Eagle link.

 grendel083 wrote:
It's listed in the iBooks version.
Just press the Psyber-Eagle link.

Isn't that the same problem the Farsight Enclave has with The Eight's Signature Systems, as it only shows it in the iBook version?
Yay for lazy copy and paste jobs.

its in my paper back GK codex, and I think its in my INq codex,
shoulbe be in back of BRB too

d6 shots 24" ap- str 4

is its profile fyi

 Elric Greywolf wrote:
Coteaz's Wargear has "psyber-eagle" listed in it. However, upon perusing the book, I can find no other reference to this piece of wargear. I know what GK Coteaz's eagle has for a profile; can someone point me to a page in this book?

An obvious and glaring oversight by GW.

The stats for his psyber eagle are as easysauce stated: d6 shots 24" ap- str 4

As for updating the digital codex, it took GW about 3 weeks to update the Condemnor Boltgun wording in the AS Codex but they did finally get around to it, I imagine they'll be a little quicker in getting this fixed.

And boy did they do a good job there, "fixing" a perfectly good gun into a worthless one just to avoid a tiny confusion that could be solved with ease.

Sigh, GW who's is charge of the rules there? a deamonhost?

I told GW DE about this a couple days ago. They where Iooking into it to fix it.

Complain to apple and you get the book for free. I got the marine dex free after I mentioned that it did not have the full version of army builder.

 Ravenous D wrote:
Complain to apple and you get the book for free. I got the marine dex free after I mentioned that it did not have the full version of army builder.

The iTunes version has it, so unless they bought the eBook through iTunes it won't help them any.

Yep, got it direct from BL, so no freebies for me :(
I have the eagle's profile in my GK book...I was just hoping I was incorrect in thinking that they forgot to put a weapon profile (necessary to take a named character) in the codex.
I thought it would be listed as Coteaz's "Relic" like in all the other 6e books. But no....

yeah... one would think an ALT-C ALT-V job would be easy... but noooooooooooooooooo....

i think everyones in HIWPI agree ment though... he has one...

 easysauce wrote:
yeah... one would think an ALT-C ALT-V job would be easy... but noooooooooooooooooo....

i think everyones in HIWPI agree ment though... he has one...

He's got it in the iPad, so it's just an error, much like the Dark Angels missing about half their wargear when they came out.

Update:
For those interested, GW updated the .epub and .mobi versions to include some additional rules they originally left out.

So what was the issue with the Condemnor Boltgun then?

It was almost made useful. GW took care of that right quick.

dadakkaest wrote:
It was almost made useful OP and caused lots of problems with RAW. GW took care of that right quick.

Fixed that for ya