Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

With all the talk of D weapons and how nasty they are, why don't I see an equal amount of talk for the void shield from the other supplement? With a potential total of up to 9 void shields to negate strength D weapons outright, for 340 points, doesn't that make it the end-all be-all of anti-titan bunkering? I mean seriously, place any decent long range firepower inside that protective bubble, and what's to worry about?

So why no void shield love? What am I missing?

Void shields are fantastic.

Truly a hidden gem.

They are good.

Of course, a few serpent shields shots will take a few down, then you fire the revanant but overall, yes they are good.

Hidden gem? Nobody talking about them? Maybe you guys are going to the wrong places.

The two things I see the most being discussed from Stronghold Assault are D-weapon fortifications and void shields.

Yeah, the Stronghold Assault tactics! thread pretty much consists of people talking about them and whether they are worth it (yes, they are in almost all circumstances)