Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
Times and dates in your local timezone.
Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.
2013/12/21 08:49:57
Subject: Re:If poorly written rules are the problem, why don't we just remove GW from the equation?
In my opinion this is what would happen during the rule writting:
"It was better last time" or "that's never going to work" and "how does that make sense? My idea was better!"
I just can't see everyone agreeing on what to do and what to change. Everyone wants something diffrent. Maybe there is a few things that could be agreed on but that's not enough to write a rule set. Not forgetting that it would have to be Play-tested! That would start a whole new argument. I just think that it would never work.
2013/12/22 07:50:47
Subject: Re:If poorly written rules are the problem, why don't we just remove GW from the equation?