| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
|
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
2013/12/26 11:07:55
Subject: Iron hands and 'multiple' allies.
|
|
Prophetic Blood Angel Librarian
|
Clann Raukaan are Iron hands so if I took an Iron Hands detachment with Clan Raukaan allies does that mean by doing so I will be prevented from taking other allies if I have dual force org? In otherwords can I have the following:
Iron hands
2 hq
4 troops
Allies
Clan Raukaan
1 hq
1 troop
Blood Angels
1 hq
1 troop
All are Battle Brothers after all so will cause no rules clashes...
Yea or nae?
|
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2013/12/26 11:09:24
|
|
|
 |
|
2013/12/26 12:00:29
Subject: Iron hands and 'multiple' allies.
|
|
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Your allies in double force org have to be from the same codex. So no.
|
|
|
|
|
2013/12/26 12:05:04
Subject: Iron hands and 'multiple' allies.
|
|
Prophetic Blood Angel Librarian
|
Thats the case I thought would apply, but wondered if Clan Ruukaan being taken from the same codex as the primary detacment would have made a difference.
Automatically Appended Next Post:
Thanks for clearing that up!
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2013/12/26 12:06:20
|
|
|
|
|
2013/12/26 12:56:26
Subject: Re:Iron hands and 'multiple' allies.
|
|
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
There is room for debate if you can take iron hands in two primary detachments, clan ruukaan as an allied detachment and white scars/salamanders/ultramariens/imperial fists/sentinals of terra/etc as the second allied detachment because units for those forces all come out of the same actual codex. The Blood Angels however do not come from the same codex as the other allied detachment so its definitely a no go.
|
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2013/12/26 12:57:38
|
|
|
|
|
2013/12/26 13:32:27
Subject: Iron hands and 'multiple' allies.
|
|
Veteran Inquisitorial Tyranid Xenokiller
|
Remember in the SM Codex it says when taking SM allies with a different chapter tactic that they count as a separate codex which means normally you would have to take the same CT for both ally slots in double force org. I'm not sure if Clan Raukaan says anything to change that but I don't think it does.
|
|
|
|
|
2013/12/26 13:37:05
Subject: Iron hands and 'multiple' allies.
|
|
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Can you ally Clan Raukaan to other Iron Hands Space Marines? I just assumed they'd be a normal detachment.
|
|
|
|
|
2013/12/26 15:07:05
Subject: Iron hands and 'multiple' allies.
|
|
Lord Commander in a Plush Chair
|
 Unit1126PLL wrote:Can you ally Clan Raukaan to other Iron Hands Space Marines? I just assumed they'd be a normal detachment.
No, you cannot Ally Clan Raukaan and Iron Hands.
The Supplement does not allow it and the SM Codex specifically forbids it(no Allying 2 chapters with the same Tactics).
|
This is my Rulebook. There are many Like it, but this one is mine. Without me, my rulebook is useless. Without my rulebook, I am useless.
Stop looking for buzz words and start reading the whole sentences.
|
|
|
|
|
2013/12/26 15:40:22
Subject: Iron hands and 'multiple' allies.
|
|
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
 Kommissar Kel wrote: Unit1126PLL wrote:Can you ally Clan Raukaan to other Iron Hands Space Marines? I just assumed they'd be a normal detachment.
No, you cannot Ally Clan Raukaan and Iron Hands.
The Supplement does not allow it and the SM Codex specifically forbids it(no Allying 2 chapters with the same Tactics).
Good, so the thread is moot.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
