| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
 |
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/12/30 07:52:09
Subject: Would you trade your 3+ for a 4++ ?
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
Eastern Washington
|
With the increase in MCs and ap3+ weapons power armor isn't getting the job done. Once the only reason to pay 15 points for a space marine, it no longer lets said marine live long enough to use his tragically underpowered bolter. So do you think changing the old 3rd edition 3+ for a 4+ invulnerable would work better?
|
4,000 Word Bearers 1,500 |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/12/30 07:54:51
Subject: Would you trade your 3+ for a 4++ ?
|
 |
Homicidal Veteran Blood Angel Assault Marine
|
Not really. It reduces chances of survival in all cases, and as much as there are many cases where AP3 negates armor, there are many more where the 3+ is why many of my marines survive.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/12/30 08:10:34
Subject: Would you trade your 3+ for a 4++ ?
|
 |
Sister Vastly Superior
Colorado
|
On my monstrous creatures definitely. Most of what is shooting at them is either wounding on 6s or piercing the armor save. Its why I love chaos daemon monstrous creature lists more than their nid counter parts.
On infantry, no. The arms race hasn't quite made me think a 3+ is bad yet. And most my battle sisters aren't dieing because of my save but because of my toughness.
|
When in doubt burn it, then burn yourself for doubting. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/12/30 08:51:05
Subject: Would you trade your 3+ for a 4++ ?
|
 |
Beautiful and Deadly Keeper of Secrets
|
My CSM will still die in droves from Taudar regardless.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/12/30 09:18:20
Subject: Would you trade your 3+ for a 4++ ?
|
 |
Focused Fire Warrior
New Zealand
|
My initial answer was yes as theres so much ap3 stuff around now anyway. But then i thought about taking that 3+ for granted, it does pass against most hordes and infantry especially in close combat. I guess if you knew who you would be up against, maybe
|
6000pts
3000pts
1500pts
1000pts
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/12/30 10:15:30
Subject: Re:Would you trade your 3+ for a 4++ ?
|
 |
Secretive Dark Angels Veteran
|
The save isn't the main problem with tactical marines, it's their lackluster firepower and mobility.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/12/30 10:21:12
Subject: Would you trade your 3+ for a 4++ ?
|
 |
Focused Fire Warrior
New Zealand
|
Pretty much, but an invuln of any kind would help. Tacs are mediocre at everything, which is why i only use vets, and even then.....
|
6000pts
3000pts
1500pts
1000pts
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/12/30 10:28:23
Subject: Would you trade your 3+ for a 4++ ?
|
 |
Wicked Warp Spider
|
I don't see any justification for buffing Tacticals (or any power armour, for that matter) with better saves or invulnerables.
That said, sure I'd take it in a heartbeat. My 4+ saving rolls have always been better than my 3+ for some reason.
|
I really need to stay away from the 40K forums. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/12/30 10:44:09
Subject: Would you trade your 3+ for a 4++ ?
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
|
It still comes in really handy in close combat.
But you do tend to forget how awesome it is until you play marines again. Then suddenly you remember when they save your 24 hits against them and lose only 2 marines
I do think that the Xenos get a hard time. I think there should be more 4+ armour saves out there for the Xenos.
Might make my CSM's ap4 chainaxes worth taking finally.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/12/30 11:03:45
Subject: Would you trade your 3+ for a 4++ ?
|
 |
Long-Range Land Speeder Pilot
|
I would trade the 3+ for a price decrease.
|
Hail the Emperor. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/12/30 21:59:52
Subject: Would you trade your 3+ for a 4++ ?
|
 |
Big Mek in Kustom Dragster with Soopa-Gun
|
Main thing i use for both orks and tau to deal with marine troops is weight of fire. Neither firewarriors, gun drones, ork boyz, lootas, broadsides, or crisis burst teams have the AP to kill marines yet i do anyway because im throwing a ton of dice at them. Grown to prefer it over high ap unless its a blast or a practically guaranteed shot. Causing 3-4 AP3 wounds may kill 3-4 marines (baring cover/invul) but its vastly easier to wiff those shots and only cause 1. I almost never wiff that badly with a high RoF team. Also, a stock 4++ would be rather broken. Your entire army suddenly cannot be countered by big guns as everything has at least a 4++ for no cost increase. 3+ is not equal to a 4++ by a long shot. Even if they went to 4+ armor and 5++ backup invul stock, that would be rather insane. Other races pay out the ass to give a troop unit invul saves, if they can do it at all.
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2013/12/30 22:01:34
An ork with an idea tends to end with a bang.
14000pts Big 'n Bad Orkz
6000pts Admech/Knights
7500pts Necron Goldboys |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/12/30 22:04:27
Subject: Would you trade your 3+ for a 4++ ?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
I'd take it on my Crisis Suits in a second...
|
Like watching other people play video games (badly) while blathering about nothing in particular? Check out my Youtube channel: joemamaUSA!
BrianDavion wrote:Between the two of us... I think GW is assuming we the players are not complete idiots.
Rapidly on path to becoming the world's youngest bitter old man. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/12/30 22:19:31
Subject: Re:Would you trade your 3+ for a 4++ ?
|
 |
Hellish Haemonculus
|
I play Marines, and I would NEVER make that trade. I can get a 4+ cover save from a million different things, and I can avoid/ride out close combats well enough. Against the majority of shooting and melee, that 3+ armor save is still one of the best parts about playing an MEQ army.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/12/30 22:30:45
Subject: Re:Would you trade your 3+ for a 4++ ?
|
 |
Evasive Pleasureseeker
Lost in a blizzard, somewhere near Toronto
|
Abso-fething-lutely!!!
3+ saves are the reason I quit my Salamanders altogether and went to Daemons of Chaos once they got their first true codex in 5th! But that's mainly because I suck at passing armour saves in general...
On the other hand, my pass rate with even just the basic 5++ averages around 55% or higher per game!
Give me 3+ or worse yet, 2+ saves though? On a good day I'll run about a 15% pass rate.
Mind you, just because it's so damn fluffy, I love to tease my mate's DA's by always bringing my token squad of Fallen for him to hunt... usually lasts only 6-7 bolter wounds before the 6 guys are 'captured'.
You'd think I'd learn one of these days...
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
|