| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
 |
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/02/01 01:02:57
Subject: Could this list actually work?
|
 |
Hardened Veteran Guardsman
|
`85 x wracks in units of 10 and one unit of 5
8 x liquifiers
1 haemonculus liquifier and scissor hards/ shattershard.
This comes in at under 1000 points and puts 86 footslogging units on the table with dual poisoned weapons, automatic feel no pain with easy potential for furious charge and feel no pain once the kills start racking up, it's more of a fun list than anything but I wonder is it actually a feasible list?
|
Follow my Instagram for WIP/updates and general geekery.
gladiator.painting |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/02/01 01:08:10
Subject: Could this list actually work?
|
 |
Kelne
|
How do you fit 85 minis in 6 slots if you take units of 10 max?
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/02/01 01:12:48
Subject: Re:Could this list actually work?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
The list will only work if you add five more haemies and maybe 20-30 mandrakes. And 20 -30 scourges for AT.
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2014/02/01 01:14:31
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/02/01 01:36:29
Subject: Re:Could this list actually work?
|
 |
Glorious Lord of Chaos
The burning pits of Hades, also known as Sweden in summer
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/02/01 01:51:35
Subject: Could this list actually work?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Why indeed.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/02/02 02:06:29
Subject: Could this list actually work?
|
 |
Hardened Veteran Guardsman
|
Mandrakes really? Definitely the worst unit in the codex no matter how cool they look, actually i'm not even much of a fan of that either...
|
Follow my Instagram for WIP/updates and general geekery.
gladiator.painting |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/02/02 08:07:07
Subject: Could this list actually work?
|
 |
Deadly Dark Eldar Warrior
Colorado
|
1. He cant do what he wants unless he wants to play Double FOC
2. Pretty sure Felix is kidding
3. Mandrakes were useable in 5th but not anymore. But their models are awesome.
4. Your list wouldn't be very effective because your T4 FnP saves wont last and wont get to where they need to.
|
7th Edition Tournament Record:
15-2
War in the Mountain GT: Best Overall, 6-0 Dark Eldar
Bugeater GT: 4th, Tournament Runner Up, 5-1 Dark Eldar
Wargamescon: 7th, Best Dark Eldar. 4-1
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/02/03 02:00:59
Subject: Could this list actually work?
|
 |
Hardened Veteran Guardsman
|
Hmm just thinking about the mass amount of cheap infantry on the table, once they start getting pain tokens could be pretty nasty, FNP,Furious charge and fearless, although likely they'll be shot to death before they can wrack (see what I did there) the pain tokens.
|
Follow my Instagram for WIP/updates and general geekery.
gladiator.painting |
|
|
 |
 |
|
|