Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
Times and dates in your local timezone.
Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.
2014/02/11 22:47:50
Subject: Re:Kharybdis Assault Claw - Who can Take it?
Except that if you run units without the "40k approved" stamp, it's perfectly reasonable for your opponent to decline a game because they haven't prepared for whatever shenanigans FW tries to pull off during this week's "let's write a unit with rules that don't even make sense and charge hundreds of dollars for it" flavor. I personally don't like arguing about vaguely written rules when our different interpretations can mean the difference between winning and losing.
I'm not a WAAC player by any stretch, but there are some very basic things FW messes up and causes people to argue about incessantly. Case in point: the old dreadclaw rules.
You do realize that your exact same words also describe Games Workshop in general and all of its games?
