Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

Just for the fun of it....

HQ
Fateweaver 300

Herald of Tzeentch, Mastery lvl 3, Exalted Reward, Disc 150
Herald of Tzeentch, Mastery lvl 3, Exalted Reward, Disc 150
Herald of Tzeentch, Mastery lvl 3, Disc, Lesser Reward, Exalted Locus 155
Herald of Tzeentch, Mastery lvl 3, Disc, Lesser Reward, 130

Troops
16 Horrors, Champ 149
10 Plagues 90

Fast
9 Screamers 225

Fortification
Bastion/Quad Gun 125

Allies
Knight Paladin 375

1849

Would bloodletters be a better choice for one of your troops? They can operate the Quad gun with BS5.

Why the Paladin over the cheaper and better Errant? Otherwise looks fairly standard and is as strong as you'd expect it to be.

Why would this be fun to play against?

For the challenge? Screamerstar is admittedly rarely any fun to play against and not even competitive. But Knights largely mitigate that.

Good luck fighting vs fun serpentspam, fun seerstar, fun night-scythe spam and fun double imperial knight.

I think all those lists are more fun than Screamerstar. Some are more competitive. Some people like to have fun by playing a challenging game, some people like to just chuck a collection of models on the table and roll some dice as long as you and your opponent are aware of what you want to get out of the game you can both have fun.