Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

Hello, this is something I conjured up because why not?

CCS
+ Heavy flamer
Total: 70

Vet
+ Heavy flamer
+ Forward sentries
Total: 80

Vet
+ Heavy flamer
+ Forward sentries
Total: 80

Armoured sentinel
+ Missle Launcher
Total: 45

Armoured sentinel
+ Missle Launcher
Total: 45

Armoured sentinel
+ Missle Launcher
Total: 45

Armoured sentinel
+ Missle Launcher
Total: 45

Armoured sentinel
+ Missle Launcher
Total: 45

Armoured sentinel
+ Missle Launcher
Total: 45

Sentinels are anti-armour/light anti infantry , Vets go S&D with CCS following close by giving orders. Heavy flamer in CCS can be swapped out and both vet squads swapped to carapace. Either that or sentinel weps are swapped around. I still think sentinels are crap but with 6 of them in a point scale that limits heavy armour deployment to 2 AV14 max then it may not seem so bad. Transport-like units will be present so their survivability is increased slightly. With 6 MLs on a single AV14 target, It probably may not go down. If need be, just swap the heavy flamer on CCS and Camo to replace all sentinels with Lascannons so it's slightly more bearable.