Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

So here's what I've been doing and I'm curious as to whether or not it is legal.

Eldar Farseers have access to malefic daemonology.

Farseers also have ghost helms, which allow them to expend a warp charge to get rid of perils.

With these in mind I've been using malefic daemonology to summon some daemons using 6D6 (to make sure I get it off). I pretty much always peril, but use one of my warp charge points in the pool to get rid of the perils. Coupled with the spirit stone of anath'lan it only costs 2 charges. So I'm pretty much guaranteed to get the summoning off, without periling, for potentially low amounts of warp charges.

My question is, this is legal right? This is how you use ghost helms now?

Unknown. HIWPI, yes.

RAW is kinda sketchy until GW finally releases FAQs.

For note you could stop the wound from perils but not any other side effects

Do you still have to roll a 4+ on your Warp Charge to utilize the Helm? Or do you just remove one from your Charge pool?

Just remove it.