Switch Theme:

Flamers and 7th ed Invisibility  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in us
Lurking Gaunt






Maybe these are already clear and I just haven't had enough caffeine, but I'm rolling around two issues.

Issue 1: My crisis suits target unit X with their flamers. Target Y is close by target X and is under the effects of invisibility. If physically possible, can I position the templates in such a way as to hit a model in unit x and also connect with a few models in unit Y? If so, are those models "hit"?

Issue 2: Are invisible units affected by the "wall of death" flamer role?

Thanks YMDC
   
Made in us
The Hive Mind





1: You have to cover the maximum amount of models in unit X, but if you do that and hit models in unit Y then yes, unit Y will take wounds.

2: I can't see anything saying otherwise.

My beautiful wife wrote:Trucks = Carnifex snack, Tanks = meals.
 
   
Made in us
Lurking Gaunt






Ahh, had not seen the part about covering the maximum numbers. I'll take that into consideration.
   
Made in gb
Decrepit Dakkanaut




As above - the restriction is on targetting, not hitting. So antyhing with blast can also hit these models, as long as they didnt target them in the first place
   
 
Forum Index » 40K You Make Da Call
Go to: