Switch Theme:

Is it really Art?  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in ca
Avatar of the Bloody-Handed God





Inactive

sebster wrote:
LunaHound wrote:Art is in the eye of the beholder.
Unless you are a confirmed psychic mind reader , there is no way on earth you can claim
to understand what the artist is attempting to do.


Sayings like 'art is in the eye of the beholder' and 'the author is dead' exist because the purpose isn't to guess the intent of the author. The purpose is to take the ideas and thoughts in the work as their own thing.

And saying you need to be a mind reader to understand the artist's intent is silly. Logic and reason have their place in the world, even if the internet abandoned them years ago.




Oh, and props to wrexasaur for the art he's posted to the thread. It's good stuff.


No silly, i thought it was obvious for the situations ( hence this thread ) when people are guessing / wondering / puzzled / confused
to why something is claiming to be art ( or not art )

Paused
◙▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
           ◂◂  ►  ▐ ▌  ◼  ▸▸
          ʳʷ   ᵖˡᵃʸ  ᵖᵃᵘˢᵉ  ˢᵗᵒᵖ   ᶠᶠ 
   
Made in au
The Dread Evil Lord Varlak





LunaHound wrote:No silly, i thought it was obvious for the situations ( hence this thread ) when people are guessing / wondering / puzzled / confused
to why something is claiming to be art ( or not art )


But just because the author intended it to be art doesn't mean it is art. Kenny G probably thinks his stuff is art but it isn't.

There's also stuff that has people just expressing for the sake of it, they make no greater claims to their work. But others view it and they see art.

“We may observe that the government in a civilized country is much more expensive than in a barbarous one; and when we say that one government is more expensive than another, it is the same as if we said that that one country is farther advanced in improvement than another. To say that the government is expensive and the people not oppressed is to say that the people are rich.”

Adam Smith, who must have been some kind of leftie or something. 
   
Made in us
Incorporating Wet-Blending






Glendale, AZ

Envy89 wrote:art




NOT art




one of these is ok to show in public... one of these is not.

looking at the statue of david is one thing, what they were doing is completaly different.


I disagree, that airbrusher has TALENT.

Mannahnin wrote:A lot of folks online (and in emails in other parts of life) use pretty mangled English. The idea is that it takes extra effort and time to write properly, and they’d rather save the time. If you can still be understood, what’s the harm? While most of the time a sloppy post CAN be understood, the use of proper grammar, punctuation, and spelling is generally seen as respectable and desirable on most forums. It demonstrates an effort made to be understood, and to make your post an easy and pleasant read. By making this effort, you can often elicit more positive responses from the community, and instantly mark yourself as someone worth talking to.
insaniak wrote: Every time someone threatens violence over the internet as a result of someone's hypothetical actions at the gaming table, the earth shakes infinitisemally in its orbit as millions of eyeballs behind millions of monitors all roll simultaneously.


 
   
 
Forum Index » Off-Topic Forum
Go to: