Poll |
 |
|
 |
Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/12/30 06:43:14
Subject: Re:This legal? Flying base question.
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
TopC wrote:It would be a permanent slight tilt. Nothing extreme. it would be approx 3 degree nose down from the enter axis mount
Do you mean 30 degrees nose down? 3 degrees nose down on a model that size is going to be something like only a millimeter or two change in position and not enough to actually change line of sight, as far as I can tell.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/12/30 07:02:16
Subject: Re:This legal? Flying base question.
|
 |
Focused Fire Warrior
Champaign IL
|
solkan wrote:TopC wrote:It would be a permanent slight tilt. Nothing extreme. it would be approx 3 degree nose down from the enter axis mount
Do you mean 30 degrees nose down? 3 degrees nose down on a model that size is going to be something like only a millimeter or two change in position and not enough to actually change line of sight, as far as I can tell.
Well as far as LoS is concerned, 1/4'' stand is at the top of their heads.. that small of a tilt if they are up ont he butt of the vehicles is enough to break LoS to the heads as well as the legs due to the length of the vehicle.. (can still see feettts)
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/12/30 08:05:04
Subject: Re:This legal? Flying base question.
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Oh, now I understand what the problem is. I have no idea what you mean by 1/4" flying stand since the shortest actual GW flying stand that I know of is a bit over 1/2" tall. Looking at the math, a 3-5 degree slope would be about right for a 1/2" drop over 3" or so. I don't know how long those models are, so I don't know whether those are the accurate measurements. Earlier in the thread I had been thinking that you were using one of the longer flying stands, and that would have been a much more pronounced angle. You aren't doing something horrifying like using a non-standard flying stand or embedding half of the flying stand in the model, are you?
Either way, if the nose of the craft is in the air and the end is touching or almost touching the ground, that's going to look like it's either taking off or crashing, and at the moment I find the idea of modeling the tank as crashing much more amusing. You can do what you feel you need to do in order to save your plastic guys from being sniped, but I will reserve the right to retaliatory eye rolling and/or pointing and giggling as the situation requires.
On a more serious note, have the alternatives failed? I mean, have you tried the tactic of actually talking to your regular opponents and asking them to back off on the LOS sniping?
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/12/30 08:26:20
Subject: This legal? Flying base question.
|
 |
Tough Traitorous Guardsman
|
i'd be fine with it :/
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/12/30 17:53:45
Subject: Re:This legal? Flying base question.
|
 |
Focused Fire Warrior
Champaign IL
|
solkan wrote:Oh, now I understand what the problem is. I have no idea what you mean by 1/4" flying stand since the shortest actual GW flying stand that I know of is a bit over 1/2" tall. Looking at the math, a 3-5 degree slope would be about right for a 1/2" drop over 3" or so. I don't know how long those models are, so I don't know whether those are the accurate measurements. Earlier in the thread I had been thinking that you were using one of the longer flying stands, and that would have been a much more pronounced angle. You aren't doing something horrifying like using a non-standard flying stand or embedding half of the flying stand in the model, are you?
Either way, if the nose of the craft is in the air and the end is touching or almost touching the ground, that's going to look like it's either taking off or crashing, and at the moment I find the idea of modeling the tank as crashing much more amusing. You can do what you feel you need to do in order to save your plastic guys from being sniped, but I will reserve the right to retaliatory eye rolling and/or pointing and giggling as the situation requires.
On a more serious note, have the alternatives failed? I mean, have you tried the tactic of actually talking to your regular opponents and asking them to back off on the LOS sniping?
your right my bad its a 1/2'' base i went and measured ( i was wrong! rawr LOL) 3'' is about half way point .. so yea its a big enough drop to make it almost touch the nose to the ground blocking LoS to the legs, but not the feet..
Yea i've already tried the more civil approach and its nuhuh the book says so. So I just roll w/ it..
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/12/30 17:59:19
Subject: This legal? Flying base question.
|
 |
Ork-Hunting Inquisitorial Xenokiller
|
Sadly, I also see this as a model not being placed on the base it comes with. GW designed a new flying base for this model.
|
Quote: Gwar - What Inquisitor said.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/12/30 18:03:52
Subject: This legal? Flying base question.
|
 |
Ruthless Rafkin
|
This is no different than the guy who put a bill-board on top of his looted rhino. Shady, shady gak.
|
-Loki- wrote:
40k is about slamming two slegdehammers together and hoping the other breaks first. Malifaux is about fighting with scalpels trying to hit select areas and hoping you connect more. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/12/30 18:04:46
Subject: This legal? Flying base question.
|
 |
Focused Fire Warrior
Champaign IL
|
InquisitorFabius wrote:Sadly, I also see this as a model not being placed on the base it comes with. GW designed a new flying base for this model.
it is going on the base it came with, it is going on a stand it came with Automatically Appended Next Post: Valhallan42nd wrote:This is no different than the guy who put a bill-board on top of his looted rhino. Shady, shady gak.
its vastly different, as the model isnt being modified, nor is the base. From what ive been able to find out on a LEGAL stand point (screw all the people who cant read and vote what they want not for whats legal) what i asked is completely legal. (been reading alot since i posted this)
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2009/12/30 18:08:28
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/12/30 18:15:28
Subject: This legal? Flying base question.
|
 |
Proud Phantom Titan
|
As i said Page 1 it is legal, it is technically modelling for an advantage, but at no point have you broken any rules. it also limits your guns as they have trouble shooting raised models (can shoot 45' up. till by about 30' and your not leaving much elevation)
Its like this wraith lord ...
... technically he also has advantage, he's able to get into cover more easily, on the down side his own LOS is much reduced.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/12/30 18:24:46
Subject: This legal? Flying base question.
|
 |
Focused Fire Warrior
Champaign IL
|
Tri wrote:As i said Page 1 it is legal, it is technically modelling for an advantage, but at no point have you broken any rules. it also limits your guns as they have trouble shooting raised models (can shoot 45' up. till by about 30' and your not leaving much elevation)
Its like this wraith lord ...
... technically he also has advantage, he's able to get into cover more easily, on the down side his own LOS is much reduced.
l
LOL WOW!! I wasn't talking about anything drastic.. and a few degree tilt (not even greater than 5) weapon system can still draw Los to what ever its firing from the vehicle. I'm not modifying anything (no im not mounting my suits weird, they are standing on a regular black base straight up, arms forward)
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/12/30 18:27:25
Subject: This legal? Flying base question.
|
 |
Hanging Out with Russ until Wolftime
|
By the strict letter of the rules, a Wraithlord doesn't ever have LoS
|
Got 40k Rules Question? Send an e-mail to Gwar! for your Confidential Rules Queries.
Please do not PM me unless really necessary. I much prefer e-mail.
Need it Answered RIGHT NOW!? Ring me on Skype: "gwar.the.trolle"
Looking to play some Vassal? Ring me for a game!
Download The Unofficial FAQs by Gwar! here! (Dark Eldar Draft FAQ v1.0 released 04/Nov/2010! Download it before the Pandas eat it all!) |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/12/30 18:33:33
Subject: This legal? Flying base question.
|
 |
Proud Phantom Titan
|
TopC wrote:LOL WOW!! I wasn't talking about anything drastic.. and a few degree tilt (not even greater than 5) weapon system can still draw Los to what ever its firing from the vehicle. I'm not modifying anything (no im not mounting my suits weird, they are standing on a regular black base straight up, arms forward)
I know but it helps to understand how far you can go while not breaking any rules ... Gwar! wrote:By the strict letter of the rules, a Wraithlord doesn't ever have LoS 
Which is why every Wraithlord i own has an eye on it (often wonder about making one with an eye on the sword ... now he can see round corners)
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2009/12/30 18:40:46
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/12/30 18:36:32
Subject: This legal? Flying base question.
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Tri wrote:TopC wrote:LOL WOW!! I wasn't talking about anything drastic.. and a few degree tilt (not even greater than 5) weapon system can still draw Los to what ever its firing from the vehicle. I'm not modifying anything (no im not mounting my suits weird, they are standing on a regular black base straight up, arms forward)
I know but it helps to understand how far you can go while not breaking any rules ...
Gwar! wrote:By the strict letter of the rules, a Wraithlord doesn't ever have LoS 
Which is why ever wraithlord i own has an eye on it (often wonder about making one with an eye on the sword ... now he can see round corners)
Well it IS a sentient weapon after all
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/12/30 19:11:47
Subject: This legal? Flying base question.
|
 |
Hanging Out with Russ until Wolftime
|
Paint it purple for endless Jokes about One Eyed Purple Swords of Dhoom!™
|
Got 40k Rules Question? Send an e-mail to Gwar! for your Confidential Rules Queries.
Please do not PM me unless really necessary. I much prefer e-mail.
Need it Answered RIGHT NOW!? Ring me on Skype: "gwar.the.trolle"
Looking to play some Vassal? Ring me for a game!
Download The Unofficial FAQs by Gwar! here! (Dark Eldar Draft FAQ v1.0 released 04/Nov/2010! Download it before the Pandas eat it all!) |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/12/31 00:43:26
Subject: This legal? Flying base question.
|
 |
Sneaky Kommando
|
Gwar! wrote:Paint it purple for endless Jokes about One Eyed Purple Swords of Dhoom!™
There's some sort of joke in there...
I'll have to think long and hard about it though...
|
MeanGreenStompa wrote:The idea of Land Raider rarity is a lie, there are millions of them, they reproduce like tribbles. Ask the Blood Angels, they have so many they even throw them out of thunderhawks moving at high speed to try and reduce the numbers.
DR:80+SGM-B+I--Pw40k09#+D++A+/hWD350R++T(M)DM+
My Army
Orks 2500+ pts |
|
 |
 |
|