Blight drones of Nurgle + Epidemus = Profit?

Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:

No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
Times and dates in your local timezone.
Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.

If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

**jdjamesdean@mail.com**

Firstborn wrote:
jdjamesdean@mail.com wrote:
Firstborn wrote:
Luide wrote:
sfshilo wrote:
Of course it's counting towards the tally.
RAW it doesn't. Blight Drone doesn't have Mark of Nurgle and it isn't Daemon of Nurgle. RAI, probably, but it is FW unit, not GW unit so you will not get ruling from GW to any direction.

No. RAW it ABSOLUTELY DOES. 100%.

It is a blight drone of Nurgle, is a nurgle unit, a nurgle daemon, and can be taken by either Codex: CSM or Codex: Chaos Daemons.

There is no more argument here fellas. Move on.

Does it absolutely?

Is it a Daemon of Nurgle? or a ___ of Nurgle, does it have a MoN?

Although I can argue RAW that while following the rules in the BGB you can't use IA/FW in a 40k game unless you're allowing houserules.

"you can't use IA/FW in a 40k game unless you're allowing houserules. "

Really? I do it all the time, and have been for the last 6 years or so. In both pickup games and tournaments.

It has never been an issue, and I expect never will be.

I suppose it's houseruled in at your shop/tournaments than. As there are no rules in the 40k rulebook nor codexes for them.

(Not antagonizing), but if you think there are you can show me. PM's or posts