Top CIA folks talk about the thinking behind EIT

Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:

No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
Times and dates in your local timezone.
Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.

If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

**Seaward**

KalashnikovMarine wrote:
*post deleted*

I wrote up a whole commentary, but.... technically I can't say gak. So I won't.

Suffice to say. I'd rather do boot camp again (three months) then have to redo SERE in December in Northern Maine. (two frozen horrible weeks)

Yep.

**Relapse**

KalashnikovMarine wrote:
Seaward wrote:
whembly wrote:
Yeah... the major difference is that they know it's a simulation, whereas the captive don't.

They're quite good at making sure that notion provides no comfort at all.

*post deleted*

I wrote up a whole commentary, but.... technically I can't say gak. So I won't.

Suffice to say. I'd rather do boot camp again (three months) then have to redo SERE in December in Northern Maine. (two frozen horrible weeks)

I'm homesick for a good ole fashioned Maine winter like the ones I enjoyed as a kid growing up there. Were you at Loring?

**Steve steveson**

.

**sebster**

Easy E wrote:
Ummm, I think we can do more than hope. We can put laws and accountability in place to make sure it the behaviours we find acceptable happen.

You know the old saying, hope in one hand and crap in the other. See which hand has more in it when you are done.

I don't put much faith in hope. I put more faith in the Rule of Law.

Yeah, that was really said. I agree completely.

Automatically Appended Next Post:

whembly wrote:
So... you saying EIT broke US laws?

No, saying there needs to be good and effective law in place to control it, and any other kind of national security thing (like drone strikes).