With a lot of these stories we basically only get the story in the initial complaint, often it takes a while for the police response, and then even longer for decent analysis to figure out where the truth lies (and we often never get that last one).
I will say, though, that even if the police acted responsibly and without any of the overt racism reported, the fact that there was a call to the police and the police thought the matter was worth taking him to the station, events I find it very hard to believe were as likely to happen if this was a white kid. That doesn't automatically mean that someone needs to be sued and hand money over, but it is worth thinking about.
djones520 wrote:I'm curious if they said that, or they said "How can a young man like yourself afford that" and he just injected the black part?
I'm not saying it went either way, but it's not a hard stretch for me to believe he assumed this was do to racism, and that's what he "remembers".
I suspect nothing like that was said at all. It just doesn't sound like how policemen talk. I could believe the question being "how can you afford that?", with young, black and the rest implicit, but actually saying those words?
Police will most likely just settle out on this one. I imagine NYPD has a large slush fund for such occasions.
While I admit this really pedantic and I apologise I can't help myself - a slush fund is a pool of general purpose money that gets used for one-off purposes, basically a strategic reserve that is originally built up dumping in all the odds and ends revenue you get over the course of many years. Whereas stuff like this lawsuit would be an on-going expense, with money set aside in a specific budget each year. So the NYPD would have a budget for such occasions. And again, I apologise, but I really, really had to do it.
Automatically Appended Next Post:
d-usa wrote:If you are called to investigate credit card fraud, and you approach the person accused of having a fake credit card, and you find that his two
IDs match him and his debit card, then what further probable cause do you have to arrest him at this point?
Other than "young black kids couldn't have this kind of money [unless it is criminal]".
If the card was signed on rather than having a PIN the signature might not have closely matched. Or possibly there was a discrepancy between
IDs, giving different home addresses. Or possibly the police asked him a question from his
ID and got one wrong (as happened to a friend of mine once when their
ID gave an old home address).
I'm not saying any of that did happen, nor am I saying that it is at all unbelievable that the police would be very heavy handed over suspicions that amounted to little more than race. I'm just saying that there's every chance there's more context to this that we haven't heard yet, because all we really have is the complaint, and that's hardly going to include both sides of the story.