Switch Theme:

What's a poor Scotsman to do?(UK politics)  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in gb
Stone Bonkers Fabricator General




We'll find out soon enough eh.

 Ketara wrote:
Computron wrote:
Blair and Brown were both born in Scotland, Cameron has Scottish ancestors. It's not like people from Scotland don't get represented so quite what the SNP are trying to achieve is anyone's guess. Personal power would be the usual suspect.


I don't think anyone claims that Scottish people are discriminated against in politics. It's more to do with the fact that all the mainstream political parties take a very english-centric view of things with regards to policies, primarily because most of the population lives in England. This leads to Scottish people, like the rest of the North of England, Wales, etc, feeling that they get left out whilst all the funding, big infrastructure projects, and industrial support all goes to London. And unlike say, Newcastle, due to there being a separate sense of nationalism (namely, being Scottish), there's less of a tendency to accept that this status quo is part and parcel of having a democracy (namely, that the weight of your voice in the halls of power should be proportionate to the number of people making that voice). The SNP draw that support from that.

What the personal attributes of the SNP politicians are is almost irrelevant. The grievance is genuine, there are many places in Britain that desperately need investment and some TLC from government. I just wish the SNP embodied less of a 'Feth anyone south of the border' attitude to things.


To be fair, the SNP were a fringe party for a long time in Scotland - even at Holyrood the first two administrations were Labour/LibDem coalitions, and this is the first time the SNP have ever even had a chance of taking a large number of Westminster seats. If people up here are supporting that attitude now it's not for no reason and it's not for want of trying the alternative; Scots bought in to the "one nation/pool & share" rhetoric of Labour and the old postwar-consensus Conservatives for a lot longer than most other parts of the UK, continuing to just vote Labour and hope we don't get shafted too badly after fifty-odd years of following that pattern is starting to get into definition of madness territory.

Maybe if the Lib Dems hadn't turned out to be spineless weasels and closet Tories we'd be seeing Scotland turn a different shade of yellow come May and the UK becoming a modern, Federal nation, but the way things are is the way things are, and the only party up here with a shot at actual power that are interested in constitutional change and haven't fully bought into austerity are the SNP, so that's where a lot of folk are going to end up regardless of how they personally feel about the rest of the UK.

 Da Boss wrote:
Um. Sorry. The conversation has moved on (probably thankfully) from my interjection. But I wanted to say:
Yodhrin: I don't think there is a great single blog for Irish political news, but I do think that the Irish Times is a newspaper that covers things fairly even handedly. The Irish Independent is a rag posing as a broadsheet, but all the quality journalism comes from the Irish Times, if you can get past their focus on Dublin.

They have an excellent Politics Podcast every wednesday, if you're ever out of things to listen to and want to give it a try.

OT, I am reading this all with interest. Some good posts ITT.


Good oh thanks, I'll have to check it out - it's really ridiculous how little coverage Irish and EU current affairs gets in UK news considering how important we all are to each other economically.




Automatically Appended Next Post:
So yeah, this happened:



Every time I think the Scottish branch of the Labour party have taken their visceral, tribal hatred of the SNP as far as they can, they prove me wrong. This guy's not the only party member who's been tweeting that image or going about encouraging people to vote Tory in SNP-held seats, just the poor bugger the media decided to notice and point out, forcing him to step down for breaking Labour's own rules that state no member can actively publicly support or campaign on behalf of any other political party.

I know it shouldn't be noteworthy, I posted the political compass earlier and I've thought of the Labour leadership as Tories in red ties for a few years now, but it's still weird to me to see them advocate voting for a party that is diametrically opposed(ostensibly) to their own philosophy over one that is far closer to their own rhetoric(if not their own actions).

This message was edited 3 times. Last update was at 2015/02/25 11:01:27


I need to acquire plastic Skavenslaves, can you help?
I have a blog now, evidently. Featuring the Alternative Mordheim Model Megalist.

"Your society's broken, so who should we blame? Should we blame the rich, powerful people who caused it? No, lets blame the people with no power and no money and those immigrants who don't even have the vote. Yea, it must be their fething fault." - Iain M Banks
-----
"The language of modern British politics is meant to sound benign. But words do not mean what they seem to mean. 'Reform' actually means 'cut' or 'end'. 'Flexibility' really means 'exploit'. 'Prudence' really means 'don't invest'. And 'efficient'? That means whatever you want it to mean, usually 'cut'. All really mean 'keep wages low for the masses, taxes low for the rich, profits high for the corporations, and accept the decline in public services and amenities this will cause'." - Robin McAlpine from Common Weal 
   
 
Forum Index » Off-Topic Forum
Go to: