Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

Naw wrote:
@Vercingstorix: You played CD in Game 3? Why did you opt to go last? I'm not sure I understood the reasoning above.

That game was a good example of the state of this game: Rock, paper, scissors.

There are armies against whom you want to go second, but against alpha strikers you don't want to give them the option of eliminating your force multipliers.

Post??

yeah, it was a case of inexperience really. This was my fourth game with the army at that point and if I was playing now I would still have null deployed but only put some nurglings on the board.

The thing is that if I set up against all those D-shots he has a re-rollable seize and I think that's a high enough a chance that I don't want to chance it.

The D-shots will probably get one of my big guys (Which he did anyway because of my poor planning!) then the jet bikes will nearly eliminate my screamer star and I'll be in a really rough place.

Basically
Null deploy: 0% chance of auto losing and against someone without intercept, >50% chance of winning(IMO).
Fully Deploy: 70% chance of auto-winning, 30% chance of auto-losing

Game 4 has been completed. Will post the results for day one awards as well. My main objective this year was to win warmaster. I had to have a perfect score to do that.

I ended up tying one other person for warmaster and they won the tie breaker which was strength of schedule.

http://www.adepticon.org/?page_id=10505
At least I still had a chance to win best Xenos.... however, one of my opponents decided to not give me top score in sportsmanship despite a completely fun game. Im never a fan of tanking scores based on results but just know your actions can affect overall rankings. Please be a good sport regardless of the outcome of a game. This led to a tie for best xenos and I lost the tie breaker which was once again strength of schedule.

So despite me doing everything i needed to win those two awards; i lost both of them to reasons i could not control. I guess i could of tried to score a better paint score then a 27. Well sometimes that is just how the cookie crumbles. Judging by the qualifiers listed it appears my game 5 will be another match-up against the same seer council build or so i thought...

So can you give a quick review before you go into day two of how your Units have worked so far and what you would change for day two for this list?

Like a Letter grade for each...... I am very interested to hear what you think of the lynx? Is it worth its points? Thank you

Really enjoy the reports!

Lol guess that was the wrong question!

 Cult of My Boy Blue wrote:
Lol guess that was the wrong question!

Sorry guys... some may not know but i have had a recent change at work and im currently working 15+ hour days. The reports are on hold for a bit as I find time to allocate back towards the hobby.

Hate it when life gets in the way of my hobbies!! NP sir hope things get back to normal soon!