Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

I would endorse a limit on all non-troop choices.
and as for this, I would endorse a limit on the number of detachments brought to the table, also.
So, max 2 hq, 2 elite, 3 heavy support, 3 fast attack and 1 dedicated flyer, max 3 detachments of any sort in a 1500 point game, for example.

 jeff white wrote:
I would endorse a limit on all non-troop choices.
and as for this, I would endorse a limit on the number of detachments brought to the table, also.
So, max 2 hq, 2 elite, 3 heavy support, 3 fast attack and 1 dedicated flyer, max 3 detachments of any sort in a 1500 point game, for example.

Better but still screws some armies over others. And btw are those per detachment or per army? Which basically means forget any detachment but battallion. Actually even with that what's the point of any non-battallion(brigade btw would be illegal...) as battallion covers max's anyway. and you are going to need troops just to fill points so battallions minimums are covered.

So yet another rule set that just makes balance worse.