Switch Theme:

Monoliths and multiple targets  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in gb
Longtime Dakkanaut






I've lost my necron codex so this may be simply resolved.

Monoliths can shoot their weapons at different targets, and the target declaration happens before picking each weapon individually. so can a monolith declare 3 targets, resolve snapshots from the gauss guns first and then fire the particle whip at whichever they feel they need to, based on casualties, jinking etc?

There's nothing that says you have to declare which gun is firing at what, only what you are firing at. nor do you have to declare if the whip is firing at all (waveserpents can use this to decide if they want to fire their shields after the other 5 S6 shots have gone out, cheating gitz).

so can a monolith deepstrike onto the battlefield, declare it is targetting 3 waveserpents, then decide which one to fire the particle whip at after they declare jinks?

12,300 points of Orks
9th W/D/L with Orks, 4/0/2
I am Thoruk, the Barbarian, Slayer of Ducks, and This is my blog!

I'm Selling Infinity, 40k, dystopian wars, UK based!

I also make designs for t-shirts and mugs and such on Redbubble! 
   
Made in us
Fixture of Dakka




Vanished Completely

While I would state that this forum is not a replacement for the codex, it is actually quite a good question given the changes between 6th and 7th edition....

My findings, I had to spend some time researching the Necron as they are not my expertise:
The partial whip can only be fired at Unit declared as the Target during that point in the sequence. This is because the Rule granting the Monolith to shoot at alternative targets is not a Rule of the Model itself, but something granted by the Gauss Flux Arc, so it is a rule only these Arc's have access too. The Rule related to these Weapons starts by saying the Gauss Flux Arc may be fired at a different Target to the rest of the Vehicles weapons, meaning that the other weapons must still follow the Rules requiring them to be shot at the Target nominated during Step 2 in the sequence.

This message was edited 4 times. Last update was at 2014/06/20 21:47:17


8th made it so I can no longer sway Tau onto the side of Chaos, but they will eventually turn aside from their idea of the Greater Good to embrace the Greatest of pleasures.  
   
Made in de
Decrepit Dakkanaut





Codex and FAQ both do not mention anything about targetting multiple targets.

   
Made in gb
Longtime Dakkanaut






 Sigvatr wrote:
Codex and FAQ both do not mention anything about targetting multiple targets.


It's under the rules for the guns, not the rules for the monolith. because it'd be too obvious to put it in the entry for the only unit that has the guns.

12,300 points of Orks
9th W/D/L with Orks, 4/0/2
I am Thoruk, the Barbarian, Slayer of Ducks, and This is my blog!

I'm Selling Infinity, 40k, dystopian wars, UK based!

I also make designs for t-shirts and mugs and such on Redbubble! 
   
Made in us
Fixture of Dakka




Vanished Completely

Indeed, it is why it took me 30 minutes to find the related section....

I have updated my post on my findings, sorry but only the Arc's themselves have permission to fire at a different Target so the Particle Whip can only fire at the nominated Target.

8th made it so I can no longer sway Tau onto the side of Chaos, but they will eventually turn aside from their idea of the Greater Good to embrace the Greatest of pleasures.  
   
Made in de
Decrepit Dakkanaut





I found it, it's in a tiny text under a chart. Come on GW >.<

JinxDragon is correct

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2014/06/20 21:49:49


   
Made in us
Fixture of Dakka




Vanished Completely

Just think like this:
It's a old Codex, it's going to be replaced soon
It's a old Codex, it's going to be replaced soon
It's a old Codex, it's going to be replaced soon

After a while you start to believe it will be better in the new Codex.

8th made it so I can no longer sway Tau onto the side of Chaos, but they will eventually turn aside from their idea of the Greater Good to embrace the Greatest of pleasures.  
   
Made in de
Decrepit Dakkanaut





As pointed out in another thread: a monolith is an awesome Bastion replacement ;D

   
Made in gb
Longtime Dakkanaut






so does that mean that models targeted by the flux arcs can't elect to jink?

or do you declare a main target, then declare some other targets, then resolve the shots?

I would have thought that you would declare the 3 targets, then the particle whip can be fired at any target the flux arcs shot at. or you would declare 4 targets, and one of them would have to be the particle whip.

how does the rule read, exactly? (I turned the room upside down but my codexes must be hiding in a box somewhere). can they target other units, or simply fire at them? if they don't target, then we may have found something that disallows jinks...


Automatically Appended Next Post:
JinxDragon wrote:
Just think like this:
It's a old Codex, it's going to be replaced soon
It's a old Codex, it's going to be replaced soon
It's a old Codex, it's going to be replaced soon

After a while you start to believe it will be better in the new Codex.


not before monday it won't so please, suggestions like "wait 'til the next codex", "why not try using a different army" or "screw monoliths, bring annihilation barges" (to pre-empt a few) aren't helpful to the question, to me or to anything.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2014/06/20 21:59:35


12,300 points of Orks
9th W/D/L with Orks, 4/0/2
I am Thoruk, the Barbarian, Slayer of Ducks, and This is my blog!

I'm Selling Infinity, 40k, dystopian wars, UK based!

I also make designs for t-shirts and mugs and such on Redbubble! 
   
Made in de
Decrepit Dakkanaut





Judging by "The Shooting Sequence" in the BRB:

1. Say you want to shoot with the monolith
2. Choose all target units (up to 4)
3. Select the weapons
4. Resolve shooting

Also, bring more Sentry Pylons / AB instead of monoliths.

Just kidding

/e: Actually..no. let me rethink the order.

/e: Naw, it's ok. You just have to resolve all Gauss Flux Arcs at the same time.

This message was edited 3 times. Last update was at 2014/06/20 22:03:17


   
Made in us
Fixture of Dakka




Vanished Completely

The Weapons do state 'fired at a different target unit to other weapons' but the Step 2 Rule in the sequence still only allows us to select a single Target.
It would likely be best, and probably most correct, to nominate each Weapon's Target during Step 2.

Also:
The whole 'It's a old Codex, it's going to be replaced soon' was in direct response to a comment about Game Workshop screwing up and a... small hope... that the next Codex will be better formatted.

This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2014/06/20 22:06:06


8th made it so I can no longer sway Tau onto the side of Chaos, but they will eventually turn aside from their idea of the Greater Good to embrace the Greatest of pleasures.  
   
Made in gb
Longtime Dakkanaut






 Sigvatr wrote:
Judging by "The Shooting Sequence" in the BRB:

1. Say you want to shoot with the monolith
2. Choose all target units (up to 4)
3. Select the weapons
4. Resolve shooting


almost, my reading of it is (for this scenario):

1: Say you want to fire the monolith
2: say which units you're targeting (and they can choose whether to jink now)
3: select the first weapon (flux arc 1) and resolve shots
4: Select the next (flux arc 2) and resolve shots
5: Flux arc 3, resolve shots
6: Particle Whip, at any target already declared (it was the other flux arcs that were targeting something else).

12,300 points of Orks
9th W/D/L with Orks, 4/0/2
I am Thoruk, the Barbarian, Slayer of Ducks, and This is my blog!

I'm Selling Infinity, 40k, dystopian wars, UK based!

I also make designs for t-shirts and mugs and such on Redbubble! 
   
Made in de
Decrepit Dakkanaut





You gotta fire all Flux Arcs at the same time because they have the same name, and yes, that's my reading too.

   
Made in gb
Longtime Dakkanaut






that is a good point, and slightly bewildering. how do we fire them all at once at different targets? I think in this instance the most sensible thing is to roll them one after the other (not flux, flux, whip, flux) or, if the opponent's pedantic, 3 different coloured dice.

12,300 points of Orks
9th W/D/L with Orks, 4/0/2
I am Thoruk, the Barbarian, Slayer of Ducks, and This is my blog!

I'm Selling Infinity, 40k, dystopian wars, UK based!

I also make designs for t-shirts and mugs and such on Redbubble! 
   
Made in de
Repentia Mistress





Santuary 101

JinxDragon wrote:
Just think like this:
It's a old Codex, it's going to be replaced soon
It's a old Codex, it's going to be replaced soon
It's a old Codex, it's going to be replaced soon

After a while you start to believe it will be better in the new Codex.


How did you read my mind? I think that every night for SoB!

DS:70+S+G+M-B--IPw40k94-D+++A++/wWD380R+T(D)DM+

Avatar scene by artist Nicholas Kay. Give credit where it's due! 
   
Made in us
Lieutenant General





Florence, KY

 some bloke wrote:
that is a good point, and slightly bewildering. how do we fire them all at once at different targets?

By doing as noted above and choosing all of their targets before resolving any of the flux arcs fire.

'It is a source of constant consternation that my opponents
cannot correlate their innate inferiority with their inevitable
defeat. It would seem that stupidity is as eternal as war.'

- Nemesor Zahndrekh of the Sautekh Dynasty
Overlord of the Crownworld of Gidrim
 
   
Made in de
Repentia Mistress





Santuary 101

The next question is, must you dictate how many flux arcs for each target? I should think so, if not it'll be advantageous for the shooting player to pick and choose after casualties.

DS:70+S+G+M-B--IPw40k94-D+++A++/wWD380R+T(D)DM+

Avatar scene by artist Nicholas Kay. Give credit where it's due! 
   
Made in us
Auspicious Daemonic Herald





 milkboy wrote:
The next question is, must you dictate how many flux arcs for each target? I should think so, if not it'll be advantageous for the shooting player to pick and choose after casualties.

They are all the same gun so are all done simultaneously
   
Made in de
Decrepit Dakkanaut





 Ghaz wrote:
 some bloke wrote:
that is a good point, and slightly bewildering. how do we fire them all at once at different targets?

By doing as noted above and choosing all of their targets before resolving any of the flux arcs fire.


This! You nominate all targets, then say you want to fire the Flux Arcs and then choose up to 3 of those targets to be fired at. All shooting of the Gauss Flux Arcs is then handled simultaneously.

   
Made in us
Fixture of Dakka




Vanished Completely

It is sad that the standard sequence did not include instructions for Units which can fire at multiple Targets, or that this old Codex wasn't such a mess in 7th edition.

The most 'fair' way would be to nominate at Step 2, ignoring the Restriction on selection a single Unit, so the enemy can nominate to Jinx like normal. At the very least they should nominate a single Unit as the 'Primary Target,' limiting things like Charge or the non-arc based weapons targeting just the Primary while Models or Weapons with permission to shoot at Secondary Targets have the ability to nominate them. Should one want to be even more just and fair, they should inform their opponents which weapon is firing at which Unit during Step 2 as well. This will prevent people accusing us of cheating, as they wouldn't be able to say we waited to see the results of the first arc fire before deciding to split the shots between more targets or concentrate them on a harder to kill secondary unit. Though, the new Rules embrace that so if people complain they are more upset over being able to see what one weapon group does before deciding what to do with the next.

It does raise the question though:
At what time do Special Rules found on Weapons trigger?

8th made it so I can no longer sway Tau onto the side of Chaos, but they will eventually turn aside from their idea of the Greater Good to embrace the Greatest of pleasures.  
   
Made in de
Repentia Mistress





Santuary 101

I think it's fair to declare which guns to which targets as well because the unit fires simultaneously.

This change to shooting may have been intended to stop the flamer/lascannon abuse but it sure does generate more problems!

DS:70+S+G+M-B--IPw40k94-D+++A++/wWD380R+T(D)DM+

Avatar scene by artist Nicholas Kay. Give credit where it's due! 
   
Made in us
Longtime Dakkanaut




 milkboy wrote:
JinxDragon wrote:
Just think like this:
It's a old Codex, it's going to be replaced soon
It's a old Codex, it's going to be replaced soon
It's a old Codex, it's going to be replaced soon

After a while you start to believe it will be better in the new Codex.


How did you read my mind? I think that every night for SoB!


and then you have a nightmare that it is 'nids Mark 2
   
 
Forum Index » 40K You Make Da Call
Go to: