Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

.

While it is a good House Rule, there is already Rules for discarding cards at the end of the Turn is there not?

.

I feel like having one of those helps me focus on other achievable objectives or denying my opponent any.

Keeping the impossible objective fits with "forging the narrative"

You know, incompetent intel and commanders.

I love maelstrom and find it can make for very interesting games.

However it feels bad if either player draws a "harness the warp" card and they're playing tau, or "destroy a flyer" card when the opponent has no fliers.

Just allowing it to be discarded makes sense imo.

I like it a lot. Having all your objectives be achievable means you have more tactical choices to choose from in your turn ("well he's got no flyers so I guess I've just got to hold objective 6"). It also means you have to make slightly harder choices about which card to discard.

I already houserule this, and I know it's quite common to do so.

Remove objectives that are impossible to achieve right from the start "cast psychic powers" buh necrons?

Personally I'd also like to standardize the D3 VP gak to just 2. Lololol I got 6 VP from 2 objectives hue