Switch Theme:

Is the size of a 40k model an accurate representation of their actual size?  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in us
Raging Ravener




All over the place

 Ashiraya wrote:
 Lord Tarkin wrote:
 Ashiraya wrote:
The Marine in the second picture is significantly larger than the one in the first.

I believe Marines are usually 7-8 feet tall. They don't have to be 9 feet tall to look intimidating. The first picture is a good example of how big and buff they are, completely musclebound and physically unmatched by any human.


I never said that nine feet is required to look intimidating.

I simply consider it the most aesthetically appropriate size.


Even still, the picture you made puts "Average height" guardsmen coming up to the marine's waist... by the ~9' scale that makes normal humans averaging 4.5' tall? the marines would have to be ~12' to match the real human height average male of 5'9"ish... Marines tower over regular folk, but they certainly arent double the height
 
Forum Index » 40K Background
Go to: