| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
 |
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/07/21 07:53:48
Subject: Melta vs Superheavy Walkers
|
 |
Lone Wolf Sentinel Pilot
|
Very quick question. I still haven't got the 7th edition rulebook and recently had a game with Tau against an army including a Knight Paladin. At one point I had fusion blasters in half range and was told melta weapons aren't allowed to roll 2 dice at half range against superheavy walkers. Not having the book myself I ended up going with that. Still killed the Knight but it took a lot of shooting. Is that rule in the main book or is it from a supplement, or is it a piece of wargear or something?
|
Driven away from WH40K by rules bloat and the expense of keeping up, now interested in smaller model count games and anything with nifty mechanics. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/07/21 07:56:09
Subject: Melta vs Superheavy Walkers
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
There is no such rule.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/07/21 07:56:38
Subject: Melta vs Superheavy Walkers
|
 |
Resolute Ultramarine Honor Guard
|
Yeah, he lied to you.
|
warboss wrote:Is there a permanent stickied thread for Chaos players to complain every time someone/anyone gets models or rules besides them? If not, there should be. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/07/21 08:10:20
Subject: Melta vs Superheavy Walkers
|
 |
Lone Wolf Sentinel Pilot
|
Well, that was quick! Thanks!
As I mentioned, I did manage to get it in the end. But if I'd used melta properly I think I could have killed it sooner and freed up some shooting for other targets.
|
Driven away from WH40K by rules bloat and the expense of keeping up, now interested in smaller model count games and anything with nifty mechanics. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/07/21 10:31:12
Subject: Re:Melta vs Superheavy Walkers
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
|
It's an old rule that is no longer used. I believe it was in apocalypse. It used to state that lance, melta, armorbane and haywire didn't gain their extra d6 and haywire only glanced on 6s.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/07/21 10:37:33
Subject: Melta vs Superheavy Walkers
|
 |
Confessor Of Sins
|
Some superheavies have the "Ceramite Plating" rule, but that is another story
|
DA:80-S+G+M+B++I-Pw40k01++D+++A+++WD100R++T(T)DM+
Roronoa Zoro wrote:When the world shoves you around, you just gotta stand up and shove back. It's not like somebody's gonna save you if you start babbling excuses. - Bring on the hardship. It's preferred in a path of carnage. Manchu wrote:
It's like you take a Space Marine and say "what could make him cooler?" Instead of adding more super-genetic-psycho-organic modification, you take it all away. You have a regular human left in power armor and all the armies of hell at the gates. And she doesn't even flinch. Pure. Badass. |
|
|
 |
 |
|
|