Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/08/04 05:10:17
Subject: BAO Screw up? Mistake or correct call?
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
Ok, I just read this on another forum. Since names are mentioned I would like to hear the other side of the story before passing judgement. I feel I should read the other side of the story.
This is what I read.
Well it was Reece who said that was the final case. But after 10 minutes of arguing he certainly knew the context. Cryptek who started the game with warriors. That's why he said the cryptek counted as a troop.
So is this a screw up on BAO? Was the right call made? I know mistakes happen, but I just really like to know what people think. Right call or not.
How can a HQ unit be Objective Secured even if it's in a troop choice? I am learning the game, so I would like page numbers to read in my iPad. So if anyone knows what iPad page I should be reading, or what section because page numbers are different on iPads, I would appreciate it.
|
Agies Grimm:The "Learn to play, bro" mentality is mostly just a way for someone to try to shame you by implying that their metaphorical nerd-wiener is bigger than yours. Which, ironically, I think nerds do even more vehemently than jocks.
Everything is made up and the points don't matter. 40K or Who's Line is it Anyway?
Auticus wrote: Or in summation: its ok to exploit shoddy points because those are rules and gamers exist to find rules loopholes (they are still "legal"), but if the same force can be composed without structure, it emotionally feels "wrong". |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/08/04 05:13:33
Subject: BAO Screw up? Mistake or correct call?
|
 |
Loyal Necron Lychguard
|
Once you attach it to the Warriors it's no longer a Hq, it's a Troop.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/08/04 05:14:47
Subject: BAO Screw up? Mistake or correct call?
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
So a HQ choice is a troop choice even if all the troops are eliminated then?
|
Agies Grimm:The "Learn to play, bro" mentality is mostly just a way for someone to try to shame you by implying that their metaphorical nerd-wiener is bigger than yours. Which, ironically, I think nerds do even more vehemently than jocks.
Everything is made up and the points don't matter. 40K or Who's Line is it Anyway?
Auticus wrote: Or in summation: its ok to exploit shoddy points because those are rules and gamers exist to find rules loopholes (they are still "legal"), but if the same force can be composed without structure, it emotionally feels "wrong". |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/08/04 05:20:42
Subject: BAO Screw up? Mistake or correct call?
|
 |
Auspicious Daemonic Herald
|
He is specifically a part of the warrior squad. Crypteks can't even choose to leave like an IC can. They are a part of the unit for all rules purposes and that includes objective secured
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/08/04 05:25:33
Subject: BAO Screw up? Mistake or correct call?
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
CrownAxe wrote:He is specifically a part of the warrior squad. Crypteks can't even choose to leave like an IC can. They are a part of the unit for all rules purposes and that includes objective secured Just reread Objective Secured. It says for Troop Units. The Cryptex is not a Troop Unit. It's a HQ unit. So what am I missing here now? I understand he was part of the squad. So you telling me if an character or unit joins a Heavy Support Squad or Fast Attack Squad then they are considered HS or FA now? So now all HQ units can join a troop choice for one turn then leave it and become Objective Secured units now? If not why not?
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2014/08/04 05:26:42
Agies Grimm:The "Learn to play, bro" mentality is mostly just a way for someone to try to shame you by implying that their metaphorical nerd-wiener is bigger than yours. Which, ironically, I think nerds do even more vehemently than jocks.
Everything is made up and the points don't matter. 40K or Who's Line is it Anyway?
Auticus wrote: Or in summation: its ok to exploit shoddy points because those are rules and gamers exist to find rules loopholes (they are still "legal"), but if the same force can be composed without structure, it emotionally feels "wrong". |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/08/04 05:27:15
Subject: BAO Screw up? Mistake or correct call?
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
|
rules citation? the cryptek just attaches to a squad, there's nothing in their description that says otherwise, or that they change battlefield roles/FOC slot. or in the necron FAQ. Automatically Appended Next Post: i checked the SW FAQ and book, looking for wolf guard pack leaders which are essentially the same thing. no FOC/role change.
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2014/08/04 05:47:02
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/08/04 05:51:12
Subject: BAO Screw up? Mistake or correct call?
|
 |
Auspicious Daemonic Herald
|
Davor wrote: CrownAxe wrote:He is specifically a part of the warrior squad. Crypteks can't even choose to leave like an IC can. They are a part of the unit for all rules purposes and that includes objective secured
Just reread Objective Secured. It says for Troop Units. The Cryptex is not a Troop Unit. It's a HQ unit. So what am I missing here now? I understand he was part of the squad. So you telling me if an character or unit joins a Heavy Support Squad or Fast Attack Squad then they are considered HS or FA now?
So now all HQ units can join a troop choice for one turn then leave it and become Objective Secured units now? If not why not?
If you leave the squad then you stop being part of that squad for rules purposes. That why this doesn't work for ICs
Crypteks can't leave the squad. That they they remain a troop even if the rest of the warriors die
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/08/04 06:01:13
Subject: BAO Screw up? Mistake or correct call?
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
|
rules citation that their battlefield role/FOC slot changes.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/08/04 06:11:04
Subject: BAO Screw up? Mistake or correct call?
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
CrownAxe wrote:Davor wrote: CrownAxe wrote:He is specifically a part of the warrior squad. Crypteks can't even choose to leave like an IC can. They are a part of the unit for all rules purposes and that includes objective secured
Just reread Objective Secured. It says for Troop Units. The Cryptex is not a Troop Unit. It's a HQ unit. So what am I missing here now? I understand he was part of the squad. So you telling me if an character or unit joins a Heavy Support Squad or Fast Attack Squad then they are considered HS or FA now?
So now all HQ units can join a troop choice for one turn then leave it and become Objective Secured units now? If not why not?
If you leave the squad then you stop being part of that squad for rules purposes. That why this doesn't work for ICs
Crypteks can't leave the squad. That they they remain a troop even if the rest of the warriors die
Please direct me to the rules please. I am trying to relearn how to play 40K so I would like to know where I should be reading this. I believe 40K is a permissive rule set correct? It tells you what you can do, not what you can't do. So where does it say that because an HQ unit can't leave, it can still be considered an OS unit?
|
Agies Grimm:The "Learn to play, bro" mentality is mostly just a way for someone to try to shame you by implying that their metaphorical nerd-wiener is bigger than yours. Which, ironically, I think nerds do even more vehemently than jocks.
Everything is made up and the points don't matter. 40K or Who's Line is it Anyway?
Auticus wrote: Or in summation: its ok to exploit shoddy points because those are rules and gamers exist to find rules loopholes (they are still "legal"), but if the same force can be composed without structure, it emotionally feels "wrong". |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/08/04 06:35:45
Subject: BAO Screw up? Mistake or correct call?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Since the Royal Court doesn't take up any slot in the force org chart what would they be considered if not a part of the unit they join?
|
Las Vegas Open Head Judge
I'm sorry if it hurts your feelings or pride, but your credentials matter. Even on the internet.
"If you do not have the knowledge, you do not have the right to the opinion." -Plato
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/08/04 06:37:18
Subject: BAO Screw up? Mistake or correct call?
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
|
they're HQ's, tons of them don't take up FOC slots. tyrant guard for nids, honor guard for the various flavors of SM, etc.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/08/04 06:40:21
Subject: BAO Screw up? Mistake or correct call?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Those all remain a unit. The Royal Court parts itself out to other units. They become part of that unit in a way none of those other examples do.
|
Las Vegas Open Head Judge
I'm sorry if it hurts your feelings or pride, but your credentials matter. Even on the internet.
"If you do not have the knowledge, you do not have the right to the opinion." -Plato
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/08/04 06:56:00
Subject: BAO Screw up? Mistake or correct call?
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
|
wolf guard do the same. nothing in their rules changes their FOC slot/battlefield role either.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/08/04 06:56:49
Subject: BAO Screw up? Mistake or correct call?
|
 |
Daring Dark Eldar Raider Rider
|
Eldar warlocks are the best analogy. Their rules are more clearly stated than Crypteks, but they too lack a specific phrase stating that they take on the battlefield role of the unit they permanently attach to.
HIWPI, they chenge roles since if they don't, it raises some very weird conflicts under certain scenarios.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/08/04 07:05:03
Subject: BAO Screw up? Mistake or correct call?
|
 |
Yellin' Yoof on a Scooter
|
My questions seem relevant here.
Case 1: A Cryptek joins a squad of Warriors in a typical CAD. Everyone dies on the enemy's shooting phase, but the Cryptek alone returns to play with a 5+ ever living.
Is the Cryptek still considered a part of the unit of Warriors, therefore keeping the Objective Secured rule?
Case 2: The same unit above, except the Cryptek survives the shooting.
Characters do not count as a part of the unit for purposes of resurrection protocols, so the RP markers for the Warriors would be removed. However, is the Cryptek still considered a part of the original Warriors unit despite this specifically noted exception?
In either of these cases, is the Cryptek considered an HQ unit at any point?
|
: 7000+ : 2200+ : 570 : 400+
Fortifications: 400+
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/08/04 07:07:40
Subject: BAO Screw up? Mistake or correct call?
|
 |
Discriminating Deathmark Assassin
|
From the character entry: "They are effectively just another trooper in their unit,...". So pack leaders and attached royal court members have objective secured just as every other trooper in their unit.
@Dilt In both cases the end result is a Necron Warrior unit with a cryptek as the only surviving member. The same as a Space Marine unit with the only surviving member a sergeant. They can capture objectives and have "objective secured".
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2014/08/04 07:10:58
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 0418/12/04 07:10:43
Subject: BAO Screw up? Mistake or correct call?
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
|
copper.talos wrote:From the character entry: "They are effectively just another trooper in their unit,...". So pack leaders and attached royal court members have objective secured just as every other trooper in their unit.
character entry where?
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/08/04 07:11:17
Subject: BAO Screw up? Mistake or correct call?
|
 |
Discriminating Deathmark Assassin
|
Under character types.
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2014/08/04 07:11:47
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/08/04 07:16:20
Subject: BAO Screw up? Mistake or correct call?
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
|
that's...pretty thin.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/08/04 07:37:42
Subject: BAO Screw up? Mistake or correct call?
|
 |
Discriminating Deathmark Assassin
|
That's your opinion. A judge that has to make a call must use rules that are written, not opinions.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/08/04 07:43:28
Subject: BAO Screw up? Mistake or correct call?
|
 |
Tough Tyrant Guard
|
IMO if everything else dies it is not a troop unit. There are no troop models to make it a troop unit - Assuming he is still placed in the HQ category of the FOC.
Can he take WL traits etc out of interest?
Do you not get a victory point for killing cryptec outside the rest of the unit?
Genuine questions relating to the same, I mean if he can and if you do the defiantly not Obsec after losing rest of the unit.
Killing the rest of the unit leaves the Cryp on his own, he hasn't 'left' but he is also no longer joined to something thats not there.
|
This message was edited 4 times. Last update was at 2014/08/04 07:46:42
It's my codex and I'll cry If I want to.
Tactical objectives are fantastic |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/08/04 07:45:24
Subject: BAO Screw up? Mistake or correct call?
|
 |
Daring Dark Eldar Raider Rider
|
Crypteks were not counted for VP if they left the court, nor did you get VP for the warrior unit until the Cryptek was dead.
Of course that FAQ is gone now...
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/08/04 07:48:18
Subject: BAO Screw up? Mistake or correct call?
|
 |
Tough Tyrant Guard
|
chelsea_hollywood wrote:Crypteks were not counted for VP if they left the court, nor did you get VP for the warrior unit until the Cryptek was dead.
Of course that FAQ is gone now...
Could be it works in its own little world, but lacks rules.
On the up side will probably be streamlined and amalgamated into normal rules on next dex release.
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2014/08/04 07:50:18
It's my codex and I'll cry If I want to.
Tactical objectives are fantastic |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/08/04 07:48:31
Subject: BAO Screw up? Mistake or correct call?
|
 |
Never Forget Isstvan!
|
The crypteks you can purchase as part of a royal court are not an HQ unit. They are purchased as part of the Overlord's slot and have special rules that allow them to attatch to other units.
Since they are not IC's, when they attatch to a Troop unit, they become part of that unit "for all rules purouse's" and basically count as a vet sergeant for the unit.
They can never detatch from the unit during the game, effectivaly becoming just another member of the unit, and therefor also becoming whichever FO slot the unit is.
|
JOIN MY CRUSADE and gain 4000 RT points!
http://www.eternalcrusade.com/account/sign-up/?ref_code=EC-PLCIKYCABW8PG |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/08/04 07:51:32
Subject: BAO Screw up? Mistake or correct call?
|
 |
Tough Tyrant Guard
|
Eihnlazer wrote:The crypteks you can purchase as part of a royal court are not an HQ unit. They are purchased as part of the Overlord's slot and have special rules that allow them to attatch to other units.
Since they are not IC's, when they attatch to a Troop unit, they become part of that unit "for all rules purouse's" and basically count as a vet sergeant for the unit.
They can never detatch from the unit during the game, effectivaly becoming just another member of the unit, and therefor also becoming whichever FO slot the unit is.
So, assuming they are not joined like a IC then was played fine. Even if they are, probably intended to stay troop.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2014/08/04 07:52:38
It's my codex and I'll cry If I want to.
Tactical objectives are fantastic |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/08/04 07:55:52
Subject: BAO Screw up? Mistake or correct call?
|
 |
Never Forget Isstvan!
|
Yeah. Royal court do not attatch like an IC. They are distributed at the start of the game into whichever squads you want them in and have to remain part of that unit for the entire game.
|
JOIN MY CRUSADE and gain 4000 RT points!
http://www.eternalcrusade.com/account/sign-up/?ref_code=EC-PLCIKYCABW8PG |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/08/04 07:56:26
Subject: BAO Screw up? Mistake or correct call?
|
 |
Loyal Necron Lychguard
Netherlands
|
Crypteks are a HQ-choice and you can let them join a unit of Warriors.
That would make the entire unit a Troop, so they'd have ObSec.
But once all warriors are dead, he's just a HQ that doesn't take up a slot and therefore won't have ObSec.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/08/04 12:01:00
Subject: BAO Screw up? Mistake or correct call?
|
 |
Discriminating Deathmark Assassin
|
Crypteks are not HQ choice, the Royal Court is. You can have one in the army list under specific conditions. If all members of a unit but the cryptek die he doesn't become a Royal Court by himself. He remains just another trooper, the last trooper, in that unit.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/08/04 13:20:30
Subject: BAO Screw up? Mistake or correct call?
|
 |
The Hive Mind
|
Kangodo wrote:But once all warriors are dead, he's just a HQ that doesn't take up a slot and therefore won't have ObSec.
No, he's not. He can't leave the Warrior unit so the Warrior unit is still around.
What you're saying is that killing a Cryptek attached to a Warrior unit will yield a VP at the end of a Purge the Alien mission even if the rest of the Warriors are around.
Or that if you attach a single Cryptek out to a Warrior unit and have the rest of the Royal Court get slaughtered, no VP is awarded at the end of PtA because that single Cryptek is alive.
|
My beautiful wife wrote:Trucks = Carnifex snack, Tanks = meals. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/08/04 13:32:44
Subject: BAO Screw up? Mistake or correct call?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
copper.talos wrote:That's your opinion. A judge that has to make a call must use rules that are written, not opinions.
So when they decided that rerollable 2+ means the reroll is 4+ it follows RAW?!?
|
|
 |
 |
|