Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

Raw wise karamazovs orbital bombardment is not barrage. However, all other orbital bombardments in the game are barrage, they do after all come from above. Karamazovs is no different fluff wise (comes from orbit). I think it was just a mistake not to include the word barrage and it should be there as intended. What is your opinion? How would you play it?

Bear in mind I already agree that RAW, it doesn't have barrage, so no need to convince me of this. Im asking RAI and HYWPI.


Automatically Appended Next Post:
Also talking about Inquisition dex - don't own GK.

That statline has remained constant across two different codexes and their FAQs. I have to think it is RAI.

I suspect the fact that he can bring it down on friendly models is why he doesn't get barrage too. The result would just be too abusively nasty.

You could house rule it if you wanted , but it doesn't make much difference

RAI I think its a mistake. Which they carried over from the GK codex to the ][ one because they did zero proof reading or playtesting.

Still angry about that inquisition book. Moreso now my gk book is defunct.

Well seeing as how it's an OSR, and not an Orbital Bombardment, and the fact it was never changed (since the codex came out, so 3 editions now), I don't think they ever intended for it to be barrage.