Switch Theme:

Why PVC instead of Styrene?  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in us
Willing Inquisitorial Excruciator






 Krellnus wrote:

You can spincast PVC and you can undercut details like you can in resin, it basically gives you the price stability and undercutting of resin with the pain in the rear and relative cheapness of metal combined into one medium, but to do so you really have to soften detail, which means it really isn't as good as it sounds.


I don't believe that is correct.

PVC is still injection molded in metal tools. I believe the major difference between it and Polystyrene is that PVC can be injected at lower temperatures and has lower cooling requirements, thus lowering mold complexity and cost.

Anything you see referred to as "Restic" and is being spin cast is a resin/plastic hybrid material, not straight PVC. The fact that PVC (and thus, injection molded) models are also referred to as "Restic" is what creates a lot of confusion. And is the number one reason that the term needs to die ASAP, in my opinion.

~Eric
 
Forum Index » Dakka Discussions
Go to: