Well, thank you for the input; however, I think that Tigirius will be quite safe in the squad of paladins, especially if those paladins have endurance and/or invisibility. Secondly, the reason why I am taking the UM as the main detachment is so I can still field a very powerful GK unit (the paladins), while still being able to deal with things from far range, which I think GK generally have a problem with.
I played a game with a very similar list that I had against a Belakor list and the paladins were able to deal with Belakor rather easily in CC and then go on to take out more CSM/daemons. The paladins were also virtually unharmed for most of the game and were hard for the opponent to deal with. I was able to roll invis with the GK libby and endurance with Tigurius.
Also, my GK allies are almost nearly half the list in points so I am trying to utilize GK's mid range strength while still being able to deal with anti-tank etc., anti-horde (from ML's) etc. from range, which is where the UM's come in.
So in regards to Tiggy not being defended, I don't see how that is an issue considering he has probably one of the best bodyguard squads possible (the paladins with five hammers and possibly endurance/invis), able to handle almost anything in CC; also as previously stated, with invis/endurance the squad is extremely resilient so I can imagine Tiggy wouldn't be harmed all game in a variety of matches, unless they were to focus everything on the squad for the first few turns, which means they are ignoring the other threats.
Lastly, there is also a 66.66% chance that (if I chose to roll on sanctic), that the GK libby could get gate for mobility issues with the paladins.
Thanks for your input thus far hyozanman, what do you think after I explained my strategy a bit more?
|