Switch Theme:

Could we have a clear definition of WAAC ?  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in us
Devestating Grey Knight Dreadknight







IIRC one example that was used previously on this board to explain a loophole a WAAC player would take advantage of was deploying vehicles sideways, then upon moving rotate them so that they gained a extra inch and then moved them.

An example of a perfectly legal, poor rule writing that no one would actually take advantage of unless of course they were reallllly wanting to win; the extra inch isn't the big deal, it's the fact you went to such extents to find the loophole to legally handwave it.
 
Forum Index » 40K General Discussion
Go to: