Poll |
 |
|
 |
Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/10/11 10:03:25
Subject: Should Named Character Psykers Have Pre-set Powers?
|
 |
Shas'ui with Bonding Knife
|
Should named character psykers have pre-set powers? I find it really weird how they have a pre-set Warlord Trait, but why do they roll for powers as usual?
I don't understand how GW thinks that it makes sense that a Psyker can know some powers for one battle, then completely forget them and learn some others next time, yet they always have the same WT.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/10/11 11:21:08
Subject: Should Named Character Psykers Have Pre-set Powers?
|
 |
Auspicious Daemonic Herald
|
This belongs in General Discussion
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/10/11 18:21:40
Subject: Should Named Character Psykers Have Pre-set Powers?
|
 |
Sword-Wielding Bloodletter of Khorne
|
Banana?
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/10/11 18:23:17
Subject: Should Named Character Psykers Have Pre-set Powers?
|
 |
Tunneling Trygon
|
If there was a model that knew Invisibility, the game would break even more than it already is. It would be in EVERY army of that faction. And if it's Imperial, then every Imperial faction would take it (likely an HQ) and a troop and that's an allied detachment right there. No. It should not happen that way.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/10/11 19:07:24
Subject: Should Named Character Psykers Have Pre-set Powers?
|
 |
Devestating Grey Knight Dreadknight
|
Shark... there IS a Imperial Forgeworld Psyker that literally lets you pick Invisibility as a power.
|
SHUPPET wrote:
wtf is this buddhist monk ascendant martial dice arts crap lol
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/10/11 19:15:20
Subject: Should Named Character Psykers Have Pre-set Powers?
|
 |
Tunneling Trygon
|
That scares me....
I'm not that familiar with all (most) of Forge World's lines so what Psyker is that?
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/10/11 19:16:43
Subject: Should Named Character Psykers Have Pre-set Powers?
|
 |
Devestating Grey Knight Dreadknight
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2014/10/11 19:18:46
SHUPPET wrote:
wtf is this buddhist monk ascendant martial dice arts crap lol
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/10/11 19:17:13
Subject: Should Named Character Psykers Have Pre-set Powers?
|
 |
Auspicious Daemonic Herald
|
Sevrin Loth of the Red Scorpions (his rules are free to download from their website)
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2014/10/11 19:17:57
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/10/11 19:35:00
Subject: Should Named Character Psykers Have Pre-set Powers?
|
 |
Tunneling Trygon
|
I might be missing something but I'm seeing he can take all six from Telekinesis and such, but not Telepathy. Or when it refers to codex powers is one if them equivalent to Invisibility?
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/10/11 19:40:49
Subject: Should Named Character Psykers Have Pre-set Powers?
|
 |
Devestating Grey Knight Dreadknight
|
whoops that wass the update TO 6th ed http://www.forgeworld.co.uk/Downloads/Product/PDF/C/Charcterupdate.pdf this is the correct one, with access to telepathy.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2014/10/11 19:40:59
SHUPPET wrote:
wtf is this buddhist monk ascendant martial dice arts crap lol
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/10/11 19:54:36
Subject: Should Named Character Psykers Have Pre-set Powers?
|
 |
Drakhun
|
Or Belakor, who is the loremaster of telepathy and knows it from the off. Invisible Lords of Skulls are incredibly funny.
|
DS:90-S+G+++M++B-IPw40k03+D+A++/fWD-R++T(T)DM+
Warmachine MKIII record 39W/0D/6L
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/10/11 19:57:04
Subject: Should Named Character Psykers Have Pre-set Powers?
|
 |
Tunneling Trygon
|
Alright, I'm back to scared now.
But, Forge World is full of scary things and while in that section of 40K I'm more okay with it, if Tigurius or Eldrad had the same or similar ability I'm sure people would be calling 'broken' far more often. Thinking of Eldrad casting Invisibility on Bright Lance War Walkers every game without fail, even as an Eldar player, feels like too much.
I have a lot of fun planning A B and C depending on what powers come up and what buffs I can hand out during or before a game.
|
|
 |
 |
|