Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

Hi there,

There is a point I don't get regarding the moral for Mek Gunz, or maybe no clear enough in the translation from english.

Let's consider 1 Mek Gun with 3 gretchins.
If I lose 1 gretchin or 1 hp during a shooting phase, do I have to make a Ld5 moral test?

Thanks for your clarification/interpretation of the rule.

Artillery rules are on page 64 of the Rulebook.

You are told to ignore the guns for the purposes of Morale tests, so in your example unit (3 grots, 1 gun) if you lost the gun, you would not need to test, but if you lost a grot you would need to test (1 out of 3 = greater than 25%).

As an aside, if you had 1 Nob and 2 Boyz in a unit, losing a wound on the Nob would not cause a Morale test - you only count models when working out if 25% have been lost for Morale.

How on earth are you losing a HP from an artillery model?

 FlingitNow wrote:
How on earth are you losing a HP from an artillery model?

If there are no grots in LoS I think you can put the wound on the gun instead of the servant.

They dont have "HP", they have wounds, was the point

Oh yeah, sorry bad terminology

 RedizDead wrote:
If there are no grots in LoS I think you can put the wound on the gun instead of the servant.

The wound is allocated to the closest model under normal circumstances, and this can be a gun model even if there are visible Grots as long as the gun is closer to the enemy.

Understood.
Thanks for all these clarifications!