| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
|
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
2015/01/02 23:12:31
Subject: Simple Question - Primary Knight Detachment FW Knights
|
|
Quick-fingered Warlord Moderatus
|
Rules are 3 Knights are required minimum for a primary attachment
FW rules state that due to rarity of the Cerastus style knights, there may not be more than one type of Cerastus X Knight than other Knights in the detachment
Would a Detachment of a Cerastus Knight Castigator, a Cerastus Knight Acheron, and a Knight Errant be legal on 40k?
As there is one of each, there is not 'more' of one type a Knight than another.
|
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2015/01/02 23:14:45
 3000
 4000 |
|
|
 |
|
2015/01/02 23:54:11
Subject: Re:Simple Question - Primary Knight Detachment FW Knights
|
|
Quick-fingered Warlord Moderatus
|
i think you've just answered your own question there mate!
|
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC-px27tzAtVwZpZ4ljopV2w "ashtrays and teacups do not count as cover"
"jack of all trades, master of none; certainly better than a master of one"
The Ordo Reductor - the guy's who make wonderful things like the Landraider Achillies, but can't use them in battle..  |
|
|
|
|
2015/01/03 00:06:25
Subject: Simple Question - Primary Knight Detachment FW Knights
|
|
Quick-fingered Warlord Moderatus
|
Well I just wanted to know if my interpretation was the agreed upon one haha.
|
3000
4000 |
|
|
|
|
2015/01/03 01:53:44
Subject: Simple Question - Primary Knight Detachment FW Knights
|
|
Stealthy Warhound Titan Princeps
Phoenix, AZ, USA
|
You are correct. You could even take a Lancer, a Castigator, and an Acheron as a legal 40k IK formation, with one as your Warlord and an automatic upgrade to Seneschal stats.
SJ
|
“For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world.”
- Ephesians 6:12
|
|
|
|
|
2015/01/03 02:05:21
Subject: Simple Question - Primary Knight Detachment FW Knights
|
|
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
+1 to above, that would be legal.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
